1988
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(88)90395-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cigarette smoking and the risk of female reproductive cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results of 7 hospital‐based26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 4 screening‐based31, 33, 34, 35 studies are mixed, they generally are not inconsistent with our own findings. Only one of these studies examined smoking of 40 cigarettes/day or more28 and found a 30% increased risk among high‐intensity smokers compared to never‐smokers. Similarly, only one of these studies examined smoking of 40 years' duration or longer,27 finding a 70% increased risk associated with smoking of long duration (limited to smokers of 25 cigarettes/day or more).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Although the results of 7 hospital‐based26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 4 screening‐based31, 33, 34, 35 studies are mixed, they generally are not inconsistent with our own findings. Only one of these studies examined smoking of 40 cigarettes/day or more28 and found a 30% increased risk among high‐intensity smokers compared to never‐smokers. Similarly, only one of these studies examined smoking of 40 years' duration or longer,27 finding a 70% increased risk associated with smoking of long duration (limited to smokers of 25 cigarettes/day or more).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Though one needs to bear in mind that the corresponding confidence intervals were large, these point estimates are possibly not in line with the majority of previous studies, which generally indicated that a high smoking intensity (e.g., smoking 20 or more cigarettes per day) is associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer [17, 22, 28, 29, 45, 47, 48, 51]. This inconsistency could be explained by the lack of adjustment for other smoking variables in earlier studies: only one [29] out of six [22, 2529] prospective cohort studies has adjusted its smoking frequency estimates for the potentially confounding effects of smoking duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A strong effect of smoking on ovarian cancer risk is unlikely as few studies have shown an association [108, 190] and most studies were null [191–195]. Recent interest in separating histological types of ovarian cancer has prompted researchers to report associations separately.…”
Section: Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%