1999
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35981999000500031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cinética de degradação ruminal do bagaço de cevada submetido a diferentes temperaturas de secagem

Abstract: RESUMO -O objetivo deste experimento foi avaliar os efeitos de diferentes temperaturas de secagem do bagaço de cevada sobre a composição química e a degradabilidade ruminal da matéria seca e da proteína bruta. As amostras do bagaço de cevada foram secas em estufa a temperatura médias de 50,2 (BC50), 100,5 (BC100), 134,1 (BC135) e 173,7 o C (BC174), e um tratamento controle, cuja amostra foi seca a frio, pelo processo de liofilização (BCL). As cinéticas de degradação ruminal foram estimadas pela técnica in situ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Garcia et al (2003), Goes et al (2004), Goes et al (2010), Goes et al (2011), Marcondes et al (2009), Martins et al (1999), Oliveira et al (2003), Pereira et al (1999), Silva et al (1999), and Zeoula et al (1999), compared the in situ ruminal degradability of protein in grains, such as soybean (Glycine max), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), canola (Brassica napus), and linseed (Linum usitatissimum), with that in processed meals such as cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) meal, peanut (Arachis hypogaea) meal, sunflower meal, soybean meal, and corn (Zea mays) gluten. Data were organized in tables on Excel® (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and the assumptions were set as described by Lovatto et al (2007), namely: definition of objectives, systematization of information, data encoding, data filtering, and data analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Garcia et al (2003), Goes et al (2004), Goes et al (2010), Goes et al (2011), Marcondes et al (2009), Martins et al (1999), Oliveira et al (2003), Pereira et al (1999), Silva et al (1999), and Zeoula et al (1999), compared the in situ ruminal degradability of protein in grains, such as soybean (Glycine max), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), canola (Brassica napus), and linseed (Linum usitatissimum), with that in processed meals such as cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) meal, peanut (Arachis hypogaea) meal, sunflower meal, soybean meal, and corn (Zea mays) gluten. Data were organized in tables on Excel® (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and the assumptions were set as described by Lovatto et al (2007), namely: definition of objectives, systematization of information, data encoding, data filtering, and data analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os valores médios obtidos com o resíduo de cervejaria estão próximos aos observados por Pereira et al (1999) em resíduo de diferentes cervejarias com de médias de PB 27,31%, EE de 10,34%, FDN de 59,41%, FDA 19,25% e lignina 6,58 %.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified