2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circadian Regulation of Cochlear Sensitivity to Noise by Circulating Glucocorticoids

Abstract: SUMMARY The cochlea possesses a robust circadian clock machinery that regulates auditory function. How the cochlear clock is influenced by the circadian system remains unknown. Here we show that cochlear rhythms are system-driven and require local Bmal1 as well as central input from the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). SCN ablations disrupted the circadian expression of the core clock genes in the cochlea. Since the circadian secretion of glucocorticoids (GCs) is controlled by the SCN and that GCs are known to mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cochlear explants from PER2::LUC reporter mice, cultured for a period of 6-9 days, were exposed for a duration of 3 days to six different doses of cisplatin (40,80,160, 400, 800, and 1600 nM), applied either at the trough of the oscillations at day 3 of the culture (day administration) or at the peak of the oscillations, at day 3.5 of the culture (night administration) in the absence of presynchronization. Day cisplatin treatment did not show any effect on PER2 rhythms on the amplitude (one-way ANOVA, F (6,27) = 0.794, P = .582), phase (one-way ANOVA, F (6,30) = 0.65, P = .69), and period (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 24) = 1.214, P = .333, Figure 5A-C). In contrast, night cisplatin administration caused a decrease in the amplitude (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 29) = 5.505, P = .0007) and delay in the phase (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 31) = 3.769, P = .006), and the period (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 29) = 3.793, P = .0065) ( Figure 5D-F).…”
Section: Per2::luc Rhythms Ex Vivomentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Cochlear explants from PER2::LUC reporter mice, cultured for a period of 6-9 days, were exposed for a duration of 3 days to six different doses of cisplatin (40,80,160, 400, 800, and 1600 nM), applied either at the trough of the oscillations at day 3 of the culture (day administration) or at the peak of the oscillations, at day 3.5 of the culture (night administration) in the absence of presynchronization. Day cisplatin treatment did not show any effect on PER2 rhythms on the amplitude (one-way ANOVA, F (6,27) = 0.794, P = .582), phase (one-way ANOVA, F (6,30) = 0.65, P = .69), and period (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 24) = 1.214, P = .333, Figure 5A-C). In contrast, night cisplatin administration caused a decrease in the amplitude (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 29) = 5.505, P = .0007) and delay in the phase (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 31) = 3.769, P = .006), and the period (one-way ANOVA, F (6, 29) = 3.793, P = .0065) ( Figure 5D-F).…”
Section: Per2::luc Rhythms Ex Vivomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…27 At the cellular level, oscillatory patterns propagate from the apex toward middle turns and cellular synchronicity within the cochlea requires the function of voltage-gated potassium channel and extracellular calcium. 28 Two consequences from this auditory clock have been evidenced: first, the cochlea is more vulnerable at nighttime to noise damage, 29 a process that requires circulating glucocorticoids 30 ; second, the action of drugs (eg, dihydroxyflavone, a selective TrkB agonist, and dexamethasone) to protect from noise-damage depending on the time-of-the-day, the TrkB agonist is effective when administered at nighttime, and dexamethasone at daytime. 29,30 Thus, drugs may have a different impact depending on the time-of-the-day when administered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These loss-of-function studies also complement the already-published gain-of-function studies. Multiple labs have successfully used this method to identify genes [22] and conditions [23] that modulate susceptibility to noise damage. Noise exposure can eliminate high-frequency auditory synapses [21, 24] in a glutamine-dependent manner [25], and the restoration of auditory synapses was proposed to be the mechanism by which SIRT3 reduced NIHL [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%