2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-020-02141-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circadian Regulation of GluA2 mRNA Processing in the Rat Suprachiasmatic Nucleus and Other Brain Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When interpreting these data, it is usually assumed that on average only ∼ 1% of GluA2 RNA in the adult brain is unedited and therefore has little signi cance. However, studies have suggested that the percentage of Q/R editing varies between parts of the brain, from 7% in the prefrontal cortex (Akbarian et al 1995) to complete editing in the gerbil hippocampus (Rump et al 1996), which is similar to the tissuespeci c editing ratio of the R/G editing site observed in our previous study (Míková et al 2021). Moreover, Q/R editing not only controls Ca 2+ permeability but also regulates the proportion of GluA2-containing surface receptors (Greger et al 2003) and attributes inward rectifying current to the AMPA receptor channel (Bowie and Mayer 1995;Swanson et al 1997), and AMPA receptors with unedited GluA2 are transiently incorporated at silent synapses during long-term potentiation (Morita et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When interpreting these data, it is usually assumed that on average only ∼ 1% of GluA2 RNA in the adult brain is unedited and therefore has little signi cance. However, studies have suggested that the percentage of Q/R editing varies between parts of the brain, from 7% in the prefrontal cortex (Akbarian et al 1995) to complete editing in the gerbil hippocampus (Rump et al 1996), which is similar to the tissuespeci c editing ratio of the R/G editing site observed in our previous study (Míková et al 2021). Moreover, Q/R editing not only controls Ca 2+ permeability but also regulates the proportion of GluA2-containing surface receptors (Greger et al 2003) and attributes inward rectifying current to the AMPA receptor channel (Bowie and Mayer 1995;Swanson et al 1997), and AMPA receptors with unedited GluA2 are transiently incorporated at silent synapses during long-term potentiation (Morita et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The rhythmicity of the Cry2 expression outside the SCN was not always consistent across experiments, and sometimes the expression pro le is unrhythmic or has low amplitude compared to other clock genes (Miyamoto and Sancar 1999;Santos et al 2015). With respect to Gria2, we have shown using in situ hybridization a circadian rhythm of Gria2 expression in the rat SCN and, using direct sequencing of PCR amplicons, a rhythm of Gria2 R/G editing in the rat hippocampus (Míková et al, 2021), but no rhythmicity of Gria2 expression has been demonstrated in the mouse brain. This nding also aligns with our RNA-seq analysis showing no Gria2 different expression between CT5 and CT15 in Adar2 -/and Gria2 R/R mice (Lebedeva 2023, under review).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Based on the above research in vivo, we found that biological rhythm regulates the process of angiogenesis after ischemic stroke and affects pathological process to a certain extent. As the core transcriptional factor, Bmal1 regulates the circadian pattern of downstream gene expression [49]. Besides this, Bmal1 has been shown to promote angiogenesis in ischemia-injured HUVECs (human umbilical vein endothelial cells) [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%