Circle of Friends or Members of a Group? Sex Differences in Relational and Collective Attachment to Groups

Abstract

In the current investigation, we studied sex differences in belonging needs by exploring men's and women's attachment to groups. Previous work has shown that women's social needs tend to be expressed in terms of relational bonds, whereas men's also have a strong collective component (e.g. Gabriel & Gardner, 1999). In this research, we asked men and women to consider one of their important group memberships and to complete Prentice, Miller, and Lightdale's (1994) group attachment scales. In two studies, findings showed that the extent to which a woman was relationally attached (i.e. felt close to the other members of her group) was sufficient to explain the group's importance to her. In contrast, men's ratings of group importance depended upon the extent of both relational and collective attachment (i.e. attached to the group identity). Implications for real-world groups are discussed. DIFFERENCES in the way that men and women approach the social world tend to captivate and amuse us. A favorite topic of sit-coms and standup comics, a standard scenario might involve a skirmish between a wife who is completely fixated on the minutia of her social relationships and a husband who is oblivious and G P I R

Unlocking the mindsets of Government Affairs Managers

“…Consequently, collectivists tend to emphasize group needs over individual needs. This type of relationship-focused group orientation of collectivists is consistent with past research which found that collectivists tend to place greater value on relatedness, interdependence and in-group identification than individualists (Seeley et al, 2003;Triandis, 1995). Further evidence suggests that members of collectivist cultures frequently cooperate in groups, especially when they are working with their in-group (e.g., close associates, Earley, 1993) but that members of individualist cultures showed a marked tendency to avoid cooperation (Kirkman and Shapiro, 2001;Leung & Bond, 1984).…”

Step-Change: Micro-Entrepreneurs’ Entry into the Middle-Class Market

“…The framework sees relational competence as a basic driver of why some entrepreneurs are capable of creating access to the resources needed to make a stepchange, whereas others are not. Such relational competences seem not equally divided across the two sexes in that they are also shaped by genetics (Baron-Cohen, 2002;Seeley, Gardner, Pennington, & Gabriel, 2003). Research has shown that, compared to men, women relate less often to highly abstract entities, such as groups, institutions, and organizations (Baumeister & Sommer, 1997;Gabriel & Gardner, 1999) because they are less equipped in predicting the behavior of systems (Baron-Cohen, 2002).…”

Constructing and validating a new measure of ingroup identification.

“…However, in the present study, we found no gender differences, neither in self-construal nor in type of identifi cation. Seeley, Gardner, Pennington, and Gabriel (2003) investigated a similar gender difference hypothesis using Prentice et al's (1994) common bond and common identity subscales. Consistent with the current results, Seeley et al also did not fi nd signifi cant gender difference.…”