We determined the impact of sex on the magnitude of cardioprotection by local and remote ischemic preconditioning (
IPC
and
RIPC
) and of ischemic/reperfused peripheral tissue mass on protection by
RIPC
. Hearts of female and male Lewis rats were excised, perfused with buffer, and underwent either
IPC
by 3 × 5/5 min global zero‐flow ischemia/reperfusion (
GI
/R) or time‐matched perfusion (
TP
) before 30/120 min
GI
/R. In a second approach, anesthetized female and male Lewis rats underwent
RIPC
, 3 × 5/5 min ischemia/reperfusion of one or both hindlimbs (1‐
RIPC
or 2‐
RIPC
), or placebo. Thirty minutes after the
RIPC
/placebo protocol, hearts were excised and subjected to
GI
/R. In female and male hearts, infarct size was less with
IPC
than with
TP
before
GI
/R (
IPC
+
GI
/R
female
: 12 ± 5%;
IPC
+
GI
/R
male
: 12 ± 7% vs.
TP
+
GI
/R
female
: 33 ± 5%;
TP
+
GI
/R
male
: 37 ± 7%,
P
< 0.001). With 2‐
RIPC
, infarct size was less than with 1‐
RIPC
in female and male rat hearts, respectively (2‐
RIPC
+
GI
/R
female
: 15 ± 5% vs. 1‐
RIPC
+
GI
/R
female
: 22 ± 7%,
P
= 0.026 and 2‐
RIPC
+
GI
/R
male
: 16 ± 5% vs. 1‐
RIPC
+
GI
/R
male
: 22 ± 8%,
P
= 0.016). Infarct size after the placebo protocol and
GI
/R was not different between female and male hearts (36 ± 8% vs. 34 ± 5%). Sex is no determinant of
IPC
‐ and
RIPC
‐induced cardioprotection in isolated Lewis rat hearts.
RIPC
‐induced cardioprotection is greater with greater mass of ischemic/reperfused peripheral tissue.