2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circulating tumor DNA as a potential marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit following surgery for localized pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
134
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
134
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of 23 patients with detectable ctDNA prior to surgical resection demonstrated that 12 converted to ctDNA-negative in the postoperative period. Of these 12, median recurrence free survival was inferior to those with undetectable preoperative ctDNA at 12.2 months compared with over 38 months in the preoperatively negative ctDNA group [ 85 ]. Early data have demonstrated that patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are ctDNA negative have an 80% chance of an R0, node negative resection compared with those with who are ctDNA positive, having only a 38% chance of an R0, node negative operation [ 86 ].…”
Section: Current Clinical Utility Of Cfdnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of 23 patients with detectable ctDNA prior to surgical resection demonstrated that 12 converted to ctDNA-negative in the postoperative period. Of these 12, median recurrence free survival was inferior to those with undetectable preoperative ctDNA at 12.2 months compared with over 38 months in the preoperatively negative ctDNA group [ 85 ]. Early data have demonstrated that patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are ctDNA negative have an 80% chance of an R0, node negative resection compared with those with who are ctDNA positive, having only a 38% chance of an R0, node negative operation [ 86 ].…”
Section: Current Clinical Utility Of Cfdnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ctDNA is believed to randomly derive from necrotic and apoptotic tumor cells across the whole tissue, it thus presumably provides a more representative genomic picture of tumor than regional tissuebased strategies. Numerous studies have shown that ctDNA profiling was able to identify and track cancerspecific mutations, which is helpful in diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and treatment response, and guiding personalized therapeutics [11,[13][14][15]. Emerging evidence suggested the ability of genome-wide or exome-wide ctDNA sequencing to capture genetic diversity including aberrations of copy number and chromosome structure in addition to single nucleotide variants [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First experiences speculated a role for ctDNA (KRAS gene mutations) in early disease diagnosis: in the study by Lennon AM et al [76] liquid biopsy specificity was high (99.5%), although at the prize of lower sensitivity (30% to 64%), meaning that in some patients tumor DNA could not be identified (probably due to overall low levels of DNA or lacking of KRAS mutations). In 2019, Gibbs P et al [77] investigated ctDNA as a surrogate marker of benefit from gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients: They showed that detectable ctDNA following curative intent was associated to poor prognosis and disease relapse, despite the adjuvant chemotherapy performed; this is a precious information but requiring validation in clinical trials. Nowadays, liquid biopsy experiences to guide "in real time" PDAC therapy in advanced disease are lacking, but they are highly desirable, especially if combined to single cell genomic tools to analyze genome/transcriptome of single circulating cells.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%