2007
DOI: 10.22495/cocv4i2c1p4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circumstances relating to interlocking directorates in Italy: An exploratory study

Abstract: Despite a large body of research in the management, accounting, economics, and finance literatures, the relationship between board composition and firm performance is still controversial and ripe for debate (for a recent study, see Boone et al., 2004). Utilizing the theoretical approach of Zahra and Pearce (1989) that identifies the three key roles of the board as oversight, strategy, and service, we examine the effects of having board interlocks between an industrial firm and of financial services firm, and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 110 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, interlocking directorates are analysed frequently as a homogeneous phenomenon, where the existence of shared directors and their number are the characteristics considered for identifying their potential impacts on performance (Barroso et al, 2016;Mazzotta et al, 2017;Tan et al, 2009) and firms' strategies (Chen, 2014). The influences of the specific typologies of these directors who take part in different boards have also been considered, such as interlocking directors with extra-or intra-industry ties McCann, 2016), interlocks linked to banks (Markarian et al, 2006), women holding multiple directorships (Gamba and Goldstein, 2009;Zenou et al, 2012), etc. However, these approaches do not take into consideration the holistic view of this phenomenon that could help to explain some of the incongruent results of previous studies, for example, using an approach that considers a more complete picture of interlocks within the boards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, interlocking directorates are analysed frequently as a homogeneous phenomenon, where the existence of shared directors and their number are the characteristics considered for identifying their potential impacts on performance (Barroso et al, 2016;Mazzotta et al, 2017;Tan et al, 2009) and firms' strategies (Chen, 2014). The influences of the specific typologies of these directors who take part in different boards have also been considered, such as interlocking directors with extra-or intra-industry ties McCann, 2016), interlocks linked to banks (Markarian et al, 2006), women holding multiple directorships (Gamba and Goldstein, 2009;Zenou et al, 2012), etc. However, these approaches do not take into consideration the holistic view of this phenomenon that could help to explain some of the incongruent results of previous studies, for example, using an approach that considers a more complete picture of interlocks within the boards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%