Circumstellar Emission from Type Ib and Ic Supernovae

Abstract

The presumed Wolf-Rayet star progenitors of Type Ib/c supernovae have fast, low density winds and the shock waves generated by the supernova interaction with the wind are not expected to be radiative at typical times of observation. The injected energy spectrum of radio emitting electrons typically has an observed index p=3, which is suggestive of acceleration in cosmic ray dominated shocks. The early, absorbed part of the radio light curves can be attributed to synchrotron self-absorption, which leads to constraints on the magnetic field in the emitting region and on the circumstellar density. The range of circumstellar densities inferred from the radio emission is somewhat broader than that for Galactic Wolf-Rayet stars, if similar efficiencies of synchrotron emission are assumed in the extragalactic supernovae. For the observed and expected ranges of circumstellar densities to roughly overlap, a high efficiency of magnetic field production in the shocked region is required (epsilon_B ~ 0.1). For the expected densities around a Wolf-Rayet star, a nonthermal mechanism is generally required to explain the observed X-ray luminosities of Type Ib/c supernovae. Although the inverse Compton mechanism can explain the observed X-ray emission from SN 2002ap if the wind parameters are taken from the radio model, the mechanism is not promising for other supernovae unless the postshock magnetic energy density is much smaller than the electron energy density. In some cases another mechanism is definitely needed and we suggest that it is X-ray synchrotron emission in a case where the shock wave is cosmic ray dominated so that the electron energy spectrum flattens at high energy. More comprehensive X-ray observations of a Type Ib/c supernova are needed to determine whether this suggestion is correct.Comment: 31 pages, 2 figures, ApJ, accepted, corrected typ

A VLA Study of High-redshift GRBs. I. Multiwavelength Observations and Modeling of GRB 140311A

“…We note that the progenitor population of GRBs is also believed to produce type Ib/c supernovae, and whenever the latter are detected at radio wavelengths, the inferred density profile is consistent with a wind-like environment (e.g., Chevalier 1998;Berger et al 2002;Chevalier & Fransson 2006;Chakraborti et al 2015). However, we find that an ISM model is a better fit than a wind environment for this burst, as the latter overpredicts the radio emission before 2.5 days.…”

Baryon Loaded Relativistic Blast Waves in Supernovae

“…Given the uncertainties in the observations, we recommend the use of this expression to get an estimate of the mass-loss rate from a CEDEX progenitor. Note that this expression has similar scaling relations as Equation (23) of Chevalier & Fransson (2006). Hence, the mass-loss rate of SN 2009bb as determined using that equation by Soderberg et al (2010) remains approximately correct.…”

Shock Breakout Emission from a Type Ib/c Supernova: XRT 080109/SN 2008D

“…Particle acceleration at the gasdominated shock gives rise to the radio synchrotron radiation emission that is observed from Type Ib/c supernovae, including SN 2008D. Chevalier & Fransson (2006) found that for the conditions typically found in SNe Ib/c, the X-ray emission from the later interaction is dominated by nonthermal mechanisms (inverse Compton and synchrotron) as opposed to thermal emission.…”

“…Here we argue that the spectrum is diluted in the scattering atmosphere, so that a larger radiating region can be accommodated. In a model intended for SN 1994I, Chevalier & Fransson (2006) & Fransson (2006) model predicts a drop in X-ray luminosity after day 10 when the photospheric luminosity drops. However, the supernova was close to the detection limit of Chandra on day 10 (Soderberg et al 2008), making it difficult to check this prediction.…”