2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2744(200012)29:4<219::aid-mc1004>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cisplatin-induced response of c-jun N-terminal kinase 1 and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 in a series of cisplatin-resistant ovarian carcinoma cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, aberrantly-active Stat3 promoted by hyperactive EGFR and Jaks and the EGFR-mediated Erk activity support the altered proliferation of the resistant cells. Contrary to our study and a previous report (Cui et al , 2000) that implicate Erk activity in cisplatin resistance, it is reported that Erk activation is important in the response of renal epithelial or mouse proximal tubule cells to cisplatin (Arany et al , 2004; Kim et al , 2005), and that the loss of Erk activity may promote cisplatin-resistance (Villedieu et al , 2006). Thus, the role of Erk in the cellular response or the lack thereof to cisplatin may be cell-type and context dependent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, aberrantly-active Stat3 promoted by hyperactive EGFR and Jaks and the EGFR-mediated Erk activity support the altered proliferation of the resistant cells. Contrary to our study and a previous report (Cui et al , 2000) that implicate Erk activity in cisplatin resistance, it is reported that Erk activation is important in the response of renal epithelial or mouse proximal tubule cells to cisplatin (Arany et al , 2004; Kim et al , 2005), and that the loss of Erk activity may promote cisplatin-resistance (Villedieu et al , 2006). Thus, the role of Erk in the cellular response or the lack thereof to cisplatin may be cell-type and context dependent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas MEK/ERK inhibition in ovarian cancer increases sensitivity to cisplatininduced cell death in sensitive and resistant cell lines [32,33], MEK inhibition in melanoma led to cisplatin sensitivity in one cell line but resistance in another [34]. Inhibition of this pathway in cervical carcinoma cells can lead to increased resistance to cisplatin but not to doxorubicin [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This apparent discrepancy might be due to a difference between the cancer cell lines used in the previous and present study. In other words, the selective ERK antagonism can either potentiate [24,33,[43][44][45][46] or prevent [28][29][30][31][32]45] cisplatin-induced toxicity depending on the tumor cell line used, indicating that cisplatin-triggered ERK could convey both cell death and survival signals in a cell type-dependent manner. Therefore, the outcome of combined cisplatin/AE treatment might at least partly depend on whether the AE-mediated ERK blockade is protective or damaging for the particular tumor cell line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%