2022
DOI: 10.3390/architecture2010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizen Participation in Architecture and Urban Planning Confronted with Arnstein’s Ladder: Four Experiments into Popular Neighbourhoods of Hainaut Demonstrate Another Hierarchy

Abstract: Widely used and disseminated, Arnstein’s ladder is considered a reference for citizen participation. It, nevertheless, involves a recurrent bias and a certain confusion when confronted with projects in the Belgian and French working-class districts of cross-border Hainaut. Characterised by fundamentally opposed management systems (one bureaucratic and hierarchical, the other democratic or even delegative), these worksites challenge Arnstein’s concepts and allow us to understand that information is not a level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, ideas potentially impacting the users' environment and daily life are discussed on these platforms, and it is therefore essential that concerned citizens are aware of them. Literature on citizen participation recognizes the importance of accessing information by considering this activity as a form of participation in itself [3] or as a necessary condition for participation [38].…”
Section: Idea Browsing On Digital Participation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, ideas potentially impacting the users' environment and daily life are discussed on these platforms, and it is therefore essential that concerned citizens are aware of them. Literature on citizen participation recognizes the importance of accessing information by considering this activity as a form of participation in itself [3] or as a necessary condition for participation [38].…”
Section: Idea Browsing On Digital Participation Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While lurking has previously been negatively perceived [46], it is now widely recognized that it has positive outcomes such as the vicarious learning of the community dynamics and the propagation of information in other communities [11,17,48]. The civic nature of DPP gives a special importance to idea browsing, as it is essential for citizens to stay informed [19,38]. The large proportion of DPP users who browse ideas compared to contributors and the importance of this activity in a citizen participation context show that idea browsing is an essential part of DPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%