Citizenship rights and women's roles in development in post-conflict Nepal

Abstract

Despite human rights abuses, the ten-year conflict in Nepal brought aspects of empowerment to women, changing their role in the family and community, as women became active outside the home, challenged the security forces, and began to assert their rights as citizens. Drawing on a research project into the participation of women in community development projects in three areas of Nepal, the present article examines how far development agencies in the post-conflict period have succeeded in furthering women's citizenship rights, and in giving voice to women's concerns and participation. It argues that development organisations and agencies have continued to operate mostly without including the voices of women, and women are disappointed by these non-participatory and top-down development models, which are leaving women's status as second-class citizens unchallenged. Women are consequently exploring alternatives. The article uses examples from the field and interviews and focus groups with marginalised women and non-government organisation workers to suggest ways in which development agencies can work with participatory models to advance women's citizenship rights. Given the diversity of social groups and peoples and gender relations in Nepal, the present article will also raise critical questions about the form and content of women's participation, and the intersections of gender, class, caste, and ethnicity on citizenship rights.

Grassroots responses to violence against women and girls in post-earthquake Nepal: lessons from the field

“…The new constitution was adopted in October 2015, making Nepal a federal state. However, women's organisations argue the new constitution continues to discriminate against Nepalese women, in what is already a patriarchal society (Pant and Standing 2011). Protests from some socio-ethnic groups claiming discrimination and lack of rights in the constitution, and a blockade of the Indian border, are continuing to affect Nepal's ability to respond to the reconstruction needs after the earthquake (Haviland 2015).…”

The long-term impact of community mobilisation through participatory women's groups on women's agency in the household: A follow-up study to the Makwanpur trial

“…In 2007, the Maoist party successfully pushed for a legal provision reserving 33% of Constituent Assembly seats for women, which was carried over into the electoral rules under the new constitution in 2015 [ 37 ]. However, the Maoist party has also been heavily criticised for pursuing elite politics to the neglect of women’s interests at the grassroots level and leaving a considerable gap between its rhetoric and its own practices [ 37 – 39 ].…”

Co-producing a post-trafficking agenda: collaborating on transforming citizenship in Nepal

“…Shakti Samuha and other anti-trafficking organisations have actively lobbied for rights to livelihoods and changes in citizenship rules which discriminate against women, who historically have needed a male relative to endorse their application for citizenship on reaching 16 years of age (Pant and Standing 2011;Richardson, Poudel, and Laurie 2009). For many women returning from trafficking situations the stigma and family rejection they encounter makes this process formidable, often effectively making them stateless in their home country upon return.…”