City size and the spreading of COVID-19 in Brazil

Abstract

The current outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an unprecedented example of how fast an infectious disease can spread around the globe (especially in urban areas) and the enormous impact it causes on public health and socioeconomic activities. Despite the recent surge of investigations about different aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic, we still know little about the effects of city size on the propagation of this disease in urban areas. Here we investigate how the number of cases and deaths by COVID-19 scale with the population of Brazilian cities. Our results indicate small towns are proportionally more affected by COVID-19 during the initial spread of the disease, such that the cumulative numbers of cases and deaths per capita initially decrease with population size. However, during the long-term course of the pandemic, this urban advantage vanishes and large cities start to exhibit higher incidence of cases and deaths, such that every 1% rise in population is associated with a 0.14% increase in the number of fatalities per capita after about four months since the first two daily deaths. We argue that these patterns may be related to the existence of proportionally more health infrastructure in the largest cities and a lower proportion of older adults in large urban areas. We also find the initial growth rate of cases and deaths to be higher in large cities; however, these growth rates tend to decrease in large cities and to increase in small ones over time.

Risk of Secondary Infection Waves of COVID-19 in an Insular Region: The Case of the Balearic Islands, Spain

“…The model also has several limitations. First, as it is constructed for fitting the global numbers of infected patients, it is missing finer structure, needed for the evaluation of risks of subpopulations that are differently exposed to the virus or have different outcomes, such as the population of elderly people or health workers, and the effect of city size (36,37). Second, for COVID-19 there is evidence of three main transmission channels, namely direct contact with an infected individual with symptoms (14), contacts with an asymptomatic individual (38,39), and environmental transmission (40).…”

Creatures of the state? Metropolitan counties compensated for state inaction in initial U.S. response to COVID-19 pandemic

“…Among others, we expect that county leaders are more likely to adopt stand-alone policies if they are at a higher risk of COVID-19 outbreaks and associated deaths. This is again true for larger, denser cities [ 7 , 53 ] and if the population is particularly vulnerable.…”

Assessing the interplay between travel patterns and SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in realistic urban setting

“…While accurate forecasting of spread as well as number of deaths and recoveries require ample historical data, contact networks, and identification of zeroth case in different regions in addition to the clinical parameters (Petropoulos and Makridakis 2020). While multiple modeling groups across the globes have proactively focused on modeling the spread at global and regional scales (Chinazzi et al 2020;Vespignani 2020;Clark et al 2020), studies at urban and city scales are limited (Minetto 2020;Tuite et al 2020;Ribeiro 2020;Hâncean et al 2020;Perc et al 2020). Given the diversity in socioeconomic factors, spread characteristics, demographics, healthcare facilities, management of 2019-nCoV needs to involve local negotiations.…”