2020
DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1739431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CityPsyche—Hong Kong

Abstract: Hong Kong citizens' fierce and evolving struggles, developing from the summer of 2019 onwards, have spawned countless stories, protest tactics, sacrifices, and debates in Hong Kong society and beyond. In this article, we probe Hong Kong's condition, asking: what is the psyche of the city for which protesters are willing to risk their futures? What are the soul and esteem that these protesters hope to preserve for Hong Kong? How does the psyche of the city in revolt reflect the broader political-economic and so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such concerns have pointed to the paradox between “data-first” (out of public interest—public health governance) and “privacy-first” (concerns about surveillance and government's misuse of data as a way of controlling its citizens) (Fahey and Hino, 2020). Research has also discussed the Chinese state's surveillance that operates behind Hong Kong's city-wide fear (Chen and Barber, 2020), along with the public's mistrust of the government's top-down surveillance of social unrest (including the 2014 Umbrella Movement and the 2019 Anti-ELAB Movement). Using the contact tracing mobile app “LeaveHomeSafe” in Hong Kong as an example, this essay argues that concern about data privacy is proceeded and escalated.…”
Section: The “Social” Aspects Of Leavehomesafe: Three Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such concerns have pointed to the paradox between “data-first” (out of public interest—public health governance) and “privacy-first” (concerns about surveillance and government's misuse of data as a way of controlling its citizens) (Fahey and Hino, 2020). Research has also discussed the Chinese state's surveillance that operates behind Hong Kong's city-wide fear (Chen and Barber, 2020), along with the public's mistrust of the government's top-down surveillance of social unrest (including the 2014 Umbrella Movement and the 2019 Anti-ELAB Movement). Using the contact tracing mobile app “LeaveHomeSafe” in Hong Kong as an example, this essay argues that concern about data privacy is proceeded and escalated.…”
Section: The “Social” Aspects Of Leavehomesafe: Three Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, a few studies pointed out that the duration of a lockdown matters more than its strictness (Guan et al, 2020). Cities have generally been robust to short-term shocks (Glaeser, 2021) but may be negatively affected by long-term restrictions (Chen et al, 2022;Fezzi and Fanghella, 2021). Scholars argued that disruptions caused by the pandemic would have a longer-term effect on mobility than the duration of the emergency (Christidis et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we characterize and address the above challenges by revisiting the Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill (Anti-ELAB hereafter) movement, an impactful socio-political movement in Hong Kong, from the transportation resilience angle. There have been quite a few articles on the Anti-ELAB movement in realms such as political science, sociology, and arts (9)(10)(11)(12). We hope to advance related scholarship and practice concerning transportation resilience, which is defined as a system's capability to return to an equilibrium between the demand and supply after a disturbance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%