Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey
DOI: 10.4324/9780203311462_chapter_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civil society and citizenship inpost-war Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…see Torcal and Montero, 2000;Van Oorschot et al 2006;Pichler and Wallace, 2007). This problem is even more strongly asserted for the formal civil society in Greece (Lyberaki and Paraskevopoulos, 2002;Mouzelis, 1995;Mouzelis and Pagoulatos, 2003) even though such poor presence is not uniformly weak (Sotiropoulos, 2004). Likewise, Greece is characterized by particularly weak levels of social capital (Jones et al, 2008) that undermines social trust but also hampers networking among social actors (and, consequently, the process of information exchange that stems within such networks).…”
Section: Discussion -Managerial Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Torcal and Montero, 2000;Van Oorschot et al 2006;Pichler and Wallace, 2007). This problem is even more strongly asserted for the formal civil society in Greece (Lyberaki and Paraskevopoulos, 2002;Mouzelis, 1995;Mouzelis and Pagoulatos, 2003) even though such poor presence is not uniformly weak (Sotiropoulos, 2004). Likewise, Greece is characterized by particularly weak levels of social capital (Jones et al, 2008) that undermines social trust but also hampers networking among social actors (and, consequently, the process of information exchange that stems within such networks).…”
Section: Discussion -Managerial Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the restitution of democracy in 1974 and the steps taken towards social, political and economic reform, through the expansion of constitutional rights and legal protection, and the promotion of medium-and long-term economic programs, the development of civil society has been a very slow process. In the post-1974 era, according to Mouzelis and Pagoulatos (2002), new systemic / institutional imbalances were created that undermined what strength civil society was gaining. The authors observe that partitocratic and ploutocratic elements were intensified as political parties and economically powerful individuals continued to compete for the control of organized groups, trade-unions and nongovernmental organizations.…”
Section: Social Capital In Greece: An Overview Of the Relevant Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such has been their influence in all domains of social life that academics have talked about "partitocracy" and "colonisation of the associational sphere" (Mouzelis and Pagoulatos 2002). Trade unions, student unions, social services, and even local sports and cultural associations were, and to a large extent still are, affiliated with a political party.…”
Section: Background To the Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%