Civil Society and the State: Turkey After the Earthquake

Abstract

On 17 August 1999 Turkey was hit by a massive earthquake. Over 17,000 lives were lost and there was extensive damage to Turkey's heartland. This paper examines how various public and private institutions, including state and civil society institutions such as NGOs and the media responded to the needs of earthquake survivors. It documents the extensive involvement of NGOs in the relief efforts immediately after the disaster and examines the impact of such participation on state-civil society relations in the country. The data show that state response to the disaster went through several phases from a period of ineptitude to effective management. The paper credits the media and the NGOs for acting as advocates for survivors and forcing changes at the state level. The paper argues that an ideal response system, which fully addresses the needs of victims, can only be based on state-civil society relations that are both collaborative and adversarial.

Local perspectives on humanitarian aid in Sri Lanka after the tsunami

“…10 For example, the reliance on INGO delivery of aid post-tsunami, though welcome initially, could be in time seen as a negative phenomenon by the local authorities as it undermines the public's confidence in the government. 21 Similarly, from the community's perspective, aid is not always appreciated as it may not meet perceived needs.…”

“…Early involvement would have enabled programmes to be more sensitive to the needs of the community. 12,21 As the situation rapidly evolved from the 'emergency phase' to the 'post-emergency phase', the use of 'bottom-up' developmental approaches was more appropriate. 13 Managing this transition is not simple and does require a significant change in how programmes are planned and implemented.…”

Trust, Social and Personal Attitudes after Wildfires in a Rural Region of Greece

“…(Agrawal et al, 2008;Barton, 1969;Dynes & Quarantelli, 1980;Jalali, 2002;Miller, 2007;Schellong, 2007) the social responses have been less studied in the aftermath of a disaster (Evans & Rollins, 2008). Similarly the nature of a disaster may affect in different ways the social dynamics and also the different cultures and social-psychological factors, may affect also the responses to a disaster (Evans & Rollins, 2008).…”

Disaster Response in Turkey: Conditions Promoting Cross-Sectoral Collaboration and Implications for Effectiveness

“…Provincial governorates have no power to intervene in municipal disaster planning, yet they hold all responsibility after a disaster, which causes an "incongruous relationship" between the two (Gülkan, 2009) Along with AKP's increased dominance, political and ethnical polarization in society has clearly become stronger. As disaster response in Turkey is "heavily dependent on the compatibility of political affiliations, particularly between central government and municipalities" (Gülkan, 2009, p. 25) (Jalali, 2002;Kubicek, 2002).…”