2016
DOI: 10.1515/ijm-2016-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Claiming too much, delivering too little: testing some of Hofstede’s generalisations

Abstract: This paper considers Geert Hofstede’s claim that his national cultural ‘dimension scores’ and related rankings of countries enable effective prediction by examining a causal generalisation he has repeatedly used to illustrate that capability. When tested against cross-sectional and longitudinal empirical data about conflicts in industrial relations, the generalisation is shown not to have predictive power. A second generalisation is then tested, which also fails to demonstrate predictive capability. This paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that participant data reflected the national preference for uncertainty avoidance, which was useful to account for when implementing IPE. While data from individuals or groups cannot be assumed to represent overall culture [ 73 ] and cultural tendencies should not be perceived as predictive [ 74 ], they can draw attention to less visible factors impacting the integration of models such as practice-based IPE across countries [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that participant data reflected the national preference for uncertainty avoidance, which was useful to account for when implementing IPE. While data from individuals or groups cannot be assumed to represent overall culture [ 73 ] and cultural tendencies should not be perceived as predictive [ 74 ], they can draw attention to less visible factors impacting the integration of models such as practice-based IPE across countries [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hofstede's conceptualization of culture is both theoretically and empirically criticized. However, according to Google Scholar, the first edition of Hofstede's book has been cited more than 26,000 times and the second one -more than 21,000 times (McSweeney, Brown & Iliopoulou, 2016). The criticism ranges from qualms about the epistemological assumptions of his work and questions about the soundness of the methodology and interpretation of the data, to unease with his conceptualization of culture and the associated value dimensions (Touburg, 2016).…”
Section: National Culturea Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous existing studies as for example Jones [10], McSweeney, Brown & Iliopoulou [11] and Schmitz & Weber [12] express their critics referring the Hofstede concept. All of these critics emphasize the fact that culture is very complex what is not considered sufficiently by Hofstede.…”
Section: Criticism Of the Hofstede Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%