2019
DOI: 10.1101/865782
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clair: Exploring the limit of using a deep neural network on pileup data for germline variant calling

Abstract: 13

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the control data had less than half the precision, recall, and F1 score ( Table 1a ). The accuracy of indel calls was lower than the accuracy of SNP calls for all datasets, which is consistent with the error profile of ONT reads as shown in previous work 21 .…”
Section: Cancer Gene Panel Enrichmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the control data had less than half the precision, recall, and F1 score ( Table 1a ). The accuracy of indel calls was lower than the accuracy of SNP calls for all datasets, which is consistent with the error profile of ONT reads as shown in previous work 21 .…”
Section: Cancer Gene Panel Enrichmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We compared each call set to the Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) NA12878 small variant truth set 22 using rtg-tools to compute accuracy metrics 23 . Based on previous work 21,24 , low-complexity regions that are known to substantially reduce small variant calling accuracy were excluded. The precision, recall, and F1 scores of the UNCALLED SNP and indel calls were within one percent of the high-coverage WGS run.…”
Section: Cancer Gene Panel Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Medaka version v0.10.0 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka) was used with the consensus and variant subcommands. Clair callVarBam (git commit 54c7dd4) 24 was used with default ONT settings. Additional information was acquired from pysamstats version 1.1.2 (https://github.com/alimanfoo/pysamstats, pysam 0.15.2) using the variation strand (-t variation_strand) option.…”
Section: Variant Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%