Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1121241.1121290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarification dialogues in human-augmented mapping

Abstract: An approach to dialogue based interaction for resolution of ambiguities encountered as part of Human-Augmented Mapping (HAM) is presented. The paper focuses on issues related to spatial organisation and localisation. The dialogue pattern naturally arises as robots are introduced to novel environments. The paper discusses an approach based on the notion of Questions under Discussion (QUD). The presented approach has been implemented on a mobile platform that has dialogue capabilities and methods for metric SLAM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This significantly reduces the number of false positives. We additionally used the method presented in [46,24] for clarification dialogue to handle the few false doors that are still found. The disadvantage with this door detection scheme is that the robot is unable to detect doors where it has not traveled so far.…”
Section: Recognizing Transitions Between Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significantly reduces the number of false positives. We additionally used the method presented in [46,24] for clarification dialogue to handle the few false doors that are still found. The disadvantage with this door detection scheme is that the robot is unable to detect doors where it has not traveled so far.…”
Section: Recognizing Transitions Between Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach by Kruijff et al [2006], the robot can also initiate a clarification dialogue if it detects an inconsistency in its spatial representation, illustrating the mixed-initiative capabilities of the dialogue system. Figure 8.4 sketches the connections between the different modalities implemented in the CoSy explorer.…”
Section: Interactive Map Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user denies this fact and the map is updated accordingly. A more detailed explanation of the complete process of clarification dialogues for a similar situation is presented by Kruijff et al [2006]. …”
Section: Episode 2: Clarification Dialoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dialog manager will also need to enable a robot to express its intentions and its understanding of the current situation, including responding with alternative approaches to those proposed by the human collaborators or alerting the human team members when a proposed plan is not feasible. This type of clarification (Krujiff, Zender et al 2006) will require the robotic system to understand the speech, interpret the speech in terms of its surroundings and goals, and express itself through speech. An internal model of the communication process will need to be developed.…”
Section: The Audio Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%