2016
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarifying the confusion: old-growth savannahs and tropical ecosystem degradation

Abstract: Ancient tropical grassy biomes are often misrecognized as severely degraded forests. I trace this confusion to several factors, with roots in the nineteenth century, including misinterpretations of the nature of fire in savannahs, attempts to reconcile savannah ecology with Clementsian succession, use of physiognomic (structural) definitions of savannah and development of tropical degradation frameworks focused solely on forests. Towards clarity, I present two models that conceptualize the drivers of ecosystem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The time since livestock removal from the pastures varied between 3 and 25 years, according to the landowners or people responsible for the study areas. Despite the importance of fire for the maintenance of secondary savannas (Veldman, ), these pastures had been protected from fire since their abandonment because burning is illegal in Brazil (Durigan & Ratter, ). All areas presented a flat relief and relatively homogeneous soils (M. G. B. Cava, unpublished data) that are acidic (pH ranging from 3.7 to 4.8), sandy (total sand content ranging from 765 to 934 g/kg), with low fertility (degree of base saturation [V%] ranging from 8 to 47).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time since livestock removal from the pastures varied between 3 and 25 years, according to the landowners or people responsible for the study areas. Despite the importance of fire for the maintenance of secondary savannas (Veldman, ), these pastures had been protected from fire since their abandonment because burning is illegal in Brazil (Durigan & Ratter, ). All areas presented a flat relief and relatively homogeneous soils (M. G. B. Cava, unpublished data) that are acidic (pH ranging from 3.7 to 4.8), sandy (total sand content ranging from 765 to 934 g/kg), with low fertility (degree of base saturation [V%] ranging from 8 to 47).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, frequently, secondary savannah does not fully recover original vegetation structure and ecosystem function. The importance of secondary habitats to biodiversity conservation has increasing recognition [7], although investigation of the ecosystem health and diversity of secondary savannahs are few (see [61]). In any case, LUCC analyses of the Cerrado would benefit from improved assessment of both the processes driving encroachment and its extent, which usually results from fire suppression and has raised serious conservation concerns [48].…”
Section: Discussion (A) Change In Land Use and Land Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While true in some locations [40], in the majority of areas this perspective is misplaced [34]. A wealth of new information including dated phylogenetic analyses demonstrates the antiquity of both tree and grass species (and lineages) specialized to these biomes [25,27,28].…”
Section: Defining Tropical Grassy Biomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first time, analyses are presented on the biogeography and potential distributions of Asian savannahs [39]. Other significant steps forward in our understanding include: methods for characterizing ancient versus derived grassy biomes [40,41], comparative data on the species diversity of TGB regions across the globe [42], an improved understanding of the complex ecology of herbivory and fire [16,43] and the context-dependent response of vegetation to global change [44], and finally, tools to examine trade-offs in biodiversity, carbon and agriculture to aid land-use planning and policy [10].…”
Section: This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation