Class, gender, (hetero)sexuality and schooling: paradoxes within working‐class girls’ engagement with education and post‐16 aspirations

Abstract

This paper discusses the ways in which inner-city, ethnically diverse, working-class girls' constructions of hetero-femininities mediate and shape their dis/engagement with education and schooling. Drawing on data from a study conducted with 89 urban, working-class young people in London, attention is drawn to three main ways through which young women used heterosexual femininities to construct capital and generate identity value and worth; namely, investment in appearance through 'glamorous' hetero-femininities, heterosexual relationships with boyfriends, and the 'ladettte' discourse. We discuss how and why young women's investments in particular forms of heterosexual working-class femininity can play into their disengagement from education and schooling, drawing particular attention to the paradoxes that arise when these constructions play into other oppressive power relations.

An Analysis of High School Students’ Classroom Engagement in Relation to Various Variables

“…Bu sonuçlardan hareketle kadınların erkeklere göre derse katılımlarının daha yüksek olduğu söylenebilir. Yapılan araştırmalar bağlamında da derse katılım ile cinsiyet arasında anlamlı bir ilişki (Archer, Halsall ve Hollingworth, 2007;Furrer ve Skinner, 2003;Peterson ve Fennema, 1985) bulunduğu belirtilmiştir.…”

Identifying with Science: A case study of two 13-year-old ‘high achieving working class’ British Asian girls

“…Archer, Halsall, & Hollingworth, 2007). As such, the use of the 'case studies' of the two girls is intended to enable as in-depth exploration of the complex performativity of identities in relation to the notion of habitus, available capitals and the field of science.…”

Estereotipos del profesorado en torno al género y a la orientación sexual

“…Este modelo ideológico ha dado lugar al llamado sistema sexo--género, un esquema determinista en el que el sexo biológico condiciona destinos sociales diferentes (Archer, 2007). Se establece lo que es adecuado para hombres y mujeres reforzando categorías.…”