1999
DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5443.1381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class II-Independent Generation of CD4 Memory T Cells from Effectors

Abstract: The factors required for the generation of memory CD4 T cells remain unclear, and whether there is a continuing requirement for antigen stimulation is critical to design of vaccine strategies. CD4 effectors generated in vitro from naïve CD4 T cells of mice efficiently gave rise to small resting memory cells after transfer to class II-deficient hosts, indicating no requirement for further antigen or class II recognition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
291
1
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
20
291
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies, with respect to the reported kinetics of BFL1/A1 expression with return to basal levels at about 48 h after TCR stimulation [22], that at least a fraction of the CD31 -central naive T cells have recently been stimulated via their TCR. The observation that in all samples analyzed BFL-1/A1 expression was not enhanced in CD45RO + memory as compared to CD31 -central naive CD4 + T cells is consistent with the observation that memory CD4 + T cell maintenance is independent of MHC-II [28][29][30][31]. On the other hand the inconsistent up- regulation of BFL-1/A1 in memory as compared to CD31 + thymic naive CD4 + T cells could easily be explained by varying numbers of cells that have recently been activated in the course of foreign antigen encounter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This implies, with respect to the reported kinetics of BFL1/A1 expression with return to basal levels at about 48 h after TCR stimulation [22], that at least a fraction of the CD31 -central naive T cells have recently been stimulated via their TCR. The observation that in all samples analyzed BFL-1/A1 expression was not enhanced in CD45RO + memory as compared to CD31 -central naive CD4 + T cells is consistent with the observation that memory CD4 + T cell maintenance is independent of MHC-II [28][29][30][31]. On the other hand the inconsistent up- regulation of BFL-1/A1 in memory as compared to CD31 + thymic naive CD4 + T cells could easily be explained by varying numbers of cells that have recently been activated in the course of foreign antigen encounter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…T‐cell receptor signaling seems not to be important for the maintenance of CD4 + memory T cells. CD4 + memory T cells persist when their TCR is ablated,98 and also in MHC class II‐deficient hosts 99. For CD8 + memory T cells, the situation is less clear.…”
Section: The Lifestyle Of Circulating Memory T Lymphocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different models were proposed to explain the longevity of memory cells. Maintenance of memory CD4 and CD8 cells seems to be independent of antigen or MHC class II and I molecules, respectively [20,21]. The generation of efficient CD8 memory T cells requires the presence of CD4 T cells [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%