Classes of attacks in VANET

Sumra, Irshad Ahmed; Ahmad, Iftikhar; Hasbullah, Halabi; Manan, Jamalul-lail Ab

doi:10.1109/siecpc.2011.5876939

Cited by 69 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Following are the most common routing attacks in the VANET [11] - [12]: Black Hole attack: In this attack, a malicious node pretends to have an optimum route for the destination node and indicates that packet should route through this node after transmitting the fake routing information. The impact of this attack is that the malicious node can either drop or misuse the intercepted packets without forwarding them.…”

Section: (Iv) Routing Attackmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security Analysis of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): A Comprehensive Study

Chaubey¹

2016

IJSIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: (Iv) Routing Attackmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security Analysis of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): A Comprehensive Study

Chaubey¹

2016

IJSIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This leads to attaining a lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and makes the vehicles unable to communicate with other vehicles and RSU stations [54]. The effects of jamming can be detected using specific techniques [53,55] and can be mitigated, for example, by randomizing the frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) mechanism of the orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) standard [56], using efficient pseudo-random generator algorithms; • Flooding attacks: This type of attack consists of flooding the network with a huge volume of dummy messages that are intentionally generated by malicious nodes [57], making thus the OBUs and RSUs unable to communicate over the wireless channel.…”

Section: Attacks On Availability and Countermeasuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security of Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems: Standards, Threats Analysis and Cryptographic Countermeasures

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to the growing number of vehicles on the roads worldwide, road traffic accidents are currently recognized as a major public safety problem. In this context, connected vehicles are considered as the key enabling technology to improve road safety and to foster the emergence of next generation cooperative intelligent transport systems (ITS). Through the use of wireless communication technologies, the deployment of ITS will enable vehicles to autonomously communicate with other nearby vehicles and roadside infrastructures and will open the door for a wide range of novel road safety and driver assistive applications. However, connecting wireless-enabled vehicles to external entities can make ITS applications vulnerable to various security threats, thus impacting the safety of drivers. This article reviews the current research challenges and opportunities related to the development of secure and safe ITS applications. It first explores the architecture and main characteristics of ITS systems and surveys the key enabling standards and projects. Then, various ITS security threats are analyzed and classified, along with their corresponding cryptographic countermeasures. Finally, a detailed ITS safety application case study is analyzed and evaluated in light of the European ETSI TC ITS standard. An experimental test-bed is presented, and several elliptic curve digital signature algorithms (ECDSA) are benchmarked for signing and verifying ITS safety messages. To conclude, lessons learned, open research challenges and opportunities are discussed.

show abstract

“…These vehicles may communicate for a very small fraction of time to share important information regarding the traffic, road assistance, map sharing, weather related information and many entertainment based media files [2]. For participating in VANET a vehicle must have on board unit (OBU) [3] that operates in a dedicated short range communication (DSRC) channel [4]. Depending on the type of communication a vehicle adapts for sharing information among other participants in the network, VANET is classifies three modes of communications namely vehicle to vehicle (V2V) [5], vehicle to roadside infrastructure (V2I) and hybrid communication that is combination of both V2V and V2I [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Analysis of ECDSA Based SE-AODV Routing Protocol In VANETS

Rajkumar¹

2018

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular ad hoc networks is an emerging area for researchers to provide intelligent transportation system to the society. It is due to the wide area of applications of VANETs interest is developed among the people from different countries to be a part of it. Therefore many projects had been started and also presently working to implement VANETs in real world scenario. The main challenge in its implementation is to provide a secure mechanism against the various attacks and threats that have the capability to bring the network performance significantly down. In this paper to overcome different types of authentication based attacks in VANETs an ECDSA based secure routing protocol SE-AODV is proposed with security features incorporated in already existing AODV routing protocol. The performance of SE-AODV is evaluated and compared with original AODV and AODV with black hole attack (BH-AODV). The SE-AODV shows better performance with the parameters used for comparison with the variation in vehicle density, speed of vehicles and simulation time.

show abstract

Classes of attacks in VANET

Cited by 69 publications

References 8 publications

Security Analysis of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): A Comprehensive Study

Security Analysis of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): A Comprehensive Study

Security of Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems: Standards, Threats Analysis and Cryptographic Countermeasures

Performance Analysis of ECDSA Based SE-AODV Routing Protocol In VANETS

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About