Quantum systems, when interacting with their environments, may exhibit non-equilibrium states that are tempting to be interpreted as quantum analogs of chaotic attractors. However, different from the Hamiltonian case, the toolbox for quantifying dissipative quantum chaos remains limited. In particular, quantum generalizations of Lyapunov exponents, the main quantifiers of classical chaos, are established only within the framework of continuous measurements. We propose an alternative generalization based on the unraveling of quantum master equation into an ensemble of 'quantum trajectories', by using the so-called Monte Carlo wave-function method. We illustrate the idea with a periodically modulated open quantum dimer and demonstrate that the transition to quantum chaos matches the period-doubling route to chaos in the corresponding mean-field system.It is one of the pillar concepts of Chaos theory that complex deterministic dynamics is rooted in the local instability which forces two initially close trajectories to diverge. This divergence is conventionally quantified with Lyapunov exponents (LEs), a powerful tool to quantify dynamical chaos. The history of attempts to generalize LEs to quantum dynamics is nearly as old as the history of Quantum Chaos. Most of this history is about the Hamiltonian limit, where the spectral theory of Quantum Chaos [1] was established first. The corresponding generalizations range from early ideas to use quasi-probability functions and define quantum LEs in terms of a "distance" between them [2-4] to very recent advances based on out-of-time correlation functions [5][6][7]. When a quantum system is open and its dynamics is modeled with a quantum master equation [8], the evolution of the system's density operator can be unraveled into an ensemble of evolving trajectories, each one described by a wave function [8]. Dynamics of these wave functions is essentially stochastic; therefore, LEs could be introduced in a more intuitive way than in the Hamiltonian limit. But will so-defined exponents make sense? Here we define a particular type of quantum LEs and give a positive answer to this question. Since quantum trajectories [9] are not just a formal trick but a part of reality, e.g., in optical [10] and microwave [11] cavity systems, we believe that our results will be of interest to the theoreticians (and, hopefully, to the experimentalists) dealing with these systems.