1979
DOI: 10.3758/bf03329397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical EDR conditioning using a truly random control and subjects differing in electrodermal lability level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several correlational and discriminant function analyses did not yield any close relationship between electrodermal lability and traditional self-descriptive psychometrics. To test Katkin's (1975, p. 173) hypothesis, that electrodermal lability reflects differences in cognitive efficacy (i.e., a selective enhancement of effective central processes) rather than merely a generalized arousal mechanism, Solanto and Katkin (1979) performed a study on differential classical light-shock conditioning (Sect. 3.1.2.1), using the same kind of SR recordings transformed to log SC as Hastrup and Katkin (1976).…”
Section: Electrodermal Lability As a Traitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several correlational and discriminant function analyses did not yield any close relationship between electrodermal lability and traditional self-descriptive psychometrics. To test Katkin's (1975, p. 173) hypothesis, that electrodermal lability reflects differences in cognitive efficacy (i.e., a selective enhancement of effective central processes) rather than merely a generalized arousal mechanism, Solanto and Katkin (1979) performed a study on differential classical light-shock conditioning (Sect. 3.1.2.1), using the same kind of SR recordings transformed to log SC as Hastrup and Katkin (1976).…”
Section: Electrodermal Lability As a Traitmentioning
confidence: 99%