1994
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-12-3461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical swine fever: genetic detection and analysis of differences between virus isolates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade, various PCR assays have been developed for the detection of ASFV [1,18,35,37] and of CSFV [16,17,19,23,30,38]. These assays provide novel diagnostic tools, but a disadvantage is the restricted ability to detect only a single virus, ASFV or CSFV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, various PCR assays have been developed for the detection of ASFV [1,18,35,37] and of CSFV [16,17,19,23,30,38]. These assays provide novel diagnostic tools, but a disadvantage is the restricted ability to detect only a single virus, ASFV or CSFV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the sequence of PCR and sequencing. The molecular cloning and sequencing of some of the Italian isolates have been described (Lowings et al, 1994). The same PCR primers were used to amplify the remaining virus gene segments which were sequenced directly without molecular cloning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PHYLIP (Felsenstein, 1989) and GCG (Devereux et al, 1984) software used for the analysis of molecular sequences and MAb data were as described (Lowings et al, 1994). In addition, the PHYLIP program RestML was used to analyse RE derived data (Harding et al, 1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations