SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference 2019
DOI: 10.2118/194731-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Suppression of Blending Noise Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: Over the last few years, machine learning has become more and more a topic of interest in the seismic industry. In seismic interpretation like fault/salt dome detection (Amin et al. 2015, Guitton et al. 2017) and velocity picking (Smith 2017), there already have been successful implementations for some years now. Recently, machine learning was introduced in seismic processing algorithms like denoising, regularization and tomography (Araya-Polo et al. 2018) as well. In this abstract a deblending … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CNNs-based models have also proven successful at coherent noise attenuation within seismic data. For example, standard CNNs has been utilized for the likes of deblending [1,36] and linear noise removal [30]. The DnCNN architecture has also been employed for the suppression of linear noise within seismic data [46,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs-based models have also proven successful at coherent noise attenuation within seismic data. For example, standard CNNs has been utilized for the likes of deblending [1,36] and linear noise removal [30]. The DnCNN architecture has also been employed for the suppression of linear noise within seismic data [46,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, robust implementations of rank reduction filtering have been widely applied as a deblending tool that effectively removes blending noise, which is manifested as a non-Gaussian erratic noise, or as random noise (Wason et al 2014;Sacchi 2015, 2016;Maraschini et al 2016;Zu et al, 2017;Jeong et al 2020a). Recently, there have been numerical studies that suggest novel algorithms to seismic deblending based on sparse coding and dictionary learning (Zu et al 2019), convolutional neural networks (Baardman and Tsingas 2019;Baardman and Hegge 2020;Sun et al 2020) and unsupervised anomaly detection (Jeong et al 2020b). Alternatively, another category was introduced by an inversionbased deblending framework that iteratively predicts and subtracts blending noise from the blended data (Abma and Yan 2009;Abma et al 2010;Mahdad et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiong et al (2018) trained a CNN to automatically detect and map fault zones using 3D seismic images, whereas Wu et al (2019) proposed to use CNNs to pick the first arrivals of microseismic events. Baardman et al (2018Baardman et al ( , 2019 proposed the use of a CNN to classify data patches in a "blended" and "non-blended" class. A second, regression based, CNN was then employed to deblend the "blended" patches, but only synthetic data were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%