Classification methods for ongoing EEG and MEG signals

Abstract

Classification algorithms help predict the qualitative properties of a subject's mental state by extracting useful information from the highly multivariate non-invasive recordings of his brain activity. In particular, applying them to Magneto-encephalography (MEG) and electro-encephalography (EEG) is a challenging and promising task with prominent practical applications to e.g. Brain Computer Interface (BCI). In this paper, we first review the principles of the major classification techniques and discuss their application to MEG and EEG data classification. Next, we investigate the behavior of classification methods using real data recorded during a MEG visuomotor experiment. In particular, we study the influence of the classification algorithm, of the quantitative functional variables used in this classifier, and of the validation method. In addition, our findings suggest that by investigating the distribution of classifier coefficients, it is possible to infer knowledge and construct functional interpretations of the underlying neural mechanisms of the performed tasks. Finally, the promising results reported here (up to 97% classification accuracy on 1-second time windows) reflect the considerable potential of MEG for the continuous classification of mental states.

Methods for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review

“…Over the past years machine learning algorithms have successfully been applied to both EEG and fMRI data (Besserve et al, 2007;Pereira et al, 2009). Whereas unsupervised approaches are often used to decompose given datasets into latent variables, e.g., for artifact correction with EEG or the identification of functional networks from fMRI (Mennes et al, 2010;Joel et al, 2011), supervised approaches have drawn much attention due to their classification capabilities.…”

Guidelines for the Recording and Evaluation of Pharmaco-EEG Data in Man: The International Pharmaco-EEG Society (IPEG)

“…Some methods utilise linear combinations of EEG measures with other clinical, cognitive and affective ratings (neurometric analysis [77]). Methods based on EEG measures alone are less well developed but show future promise [78], and this field is advancing rapidly, driven mainly by the use of such techniques in functional MRI (fMRI).…”

Studying Dreaming and Consciousness

“…It records the magnetic component of the EEG electrical signals of neuronal oscillation. MEG denotes the limits of electrophysiological research, demonstrating that the magnetic potentials of the CNS are highly multivariate, constantly fluxing and changing millisecond to millisecond across the CNS (39). Faster than fMRI and PET, MEG charts the real-time rapid flux of changing synchronous fields in the CNS.…”