2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2920900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Based on a Convolution Neural Network With SVM Architecture

Abstract: Although radio frequency ablation is the most effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), there is still a high recurrence rate. The purpose of this paper was to initially assess the probability of the recurrence of AF based on the preoperative body surface potential mapping (BSPM) signals, in other words, to predict the efficiency of ablation and assist physicians in developing more effective treatment options. At present, deep learning methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) do not requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, 2D CNN models have been employed to categorize the input ECG signals into their respective classes. The input 1D ECGs are transformed into 2D before the feature extraction process [ 16 ]. The 2D CNN models offer more distinctiveness and robustness towards noise in the input signals.…”
Section: Discussion Of Both Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, 2D CNN models have been employed to categorize the input ECG signals into their respective classes. The input 1D ECGs are transformed into 2D before the feature extraction process [ 16 ]. The 2D CNN models offer more distinctiveness and robustness towards noise in the input signals.…”
Section: Discussion Of Both Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECG signals contain no less than two critical pieces of statistics, including correlated to biomedicine’s healthiness [ 3 , 4 , 5 ] and associated with personal credentials or biometrics [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. As a result of its easiness, several ECG categorizations processes have been established, counting manuals methods [ 9 , 10 ] and machine learning approaches [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The manual process is complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With more and more medical data waiting to be mined, improving performance with acceptable computational complexity for algorithms and models is urgent. Li et al (2019) propose combining CNN and SVM to build an AF recognition model, which improves model performance from 93 to 96% compared with the CNN model. Swapna et al (2018) have attempted to compare CNN net with a combination of CNN and LSTM in processing a diabetes database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of machine and deep learning technologies, more ECG category classification models have been proposed, enabling the automatic diagnosis of different heart diseases. Of these technologies, the support vector machine (SVM) approach ( Li et al, 2019 ), random forest method ( Yang et al, 2020 ), autoregressive modeling ( Ge et al, 2002 ), artificial ( Xu et al, 2015 ), and convolutional neural networks (CNNs; Kiranyaz et al, 2016 ; Hannun et al, 2019 ), and long short-term memory (LSTM) have been mainly used to establish ECG classification models ( de Chazal et al, 2004 ; Asl et al, 2008 ; Acharya et al, 2017 ; Yildirim, 2018 ). To date, several heartbeat abnormalities have been frequently studied, such as AF, premature ventricular contraction (PVC), paced beat, and left or right bundle branch block (LBBB or RBBB, respectively; Raj and Ray, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least two types of important information contained in the ECG signal, including those related to health or biomedical [2][3][4] and those related to the person identification or biometrics [5][6][7]. Due to its convenience, many ECG classification algorithms have been developed, including handcraft [4,8,9] and machine learning [10][11][12][13][14][15] methods. The handcraft method is rather difficult to utilize on non-stationary signals, such as ECG, while machine learning methods normally require high computational resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%