2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Brain MRI Tumor Images Based on Deep Learning PGGAN Augmentation

Abstract: The wide prevalence of brain tumors in all age groups necessitates having the ability to make an early and accurate identification of the tumor type and thus select the most appropriate treatment plans. The application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has helped radiologists to more accurately classify the type of brain tumor from magnetic resonance images (MRIs). The learning of CNN suffers from overfitting if a suboptimal number of MRIs are introduced to the system. Recognized as the current best solu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most data augmentation techniques aim to increase extraneous variance in the training set, deep learning can be used by itself, at least in theory, to increase meaningful variance. In a recent publication by Allah et al [ 44 ], a novel data augmentation method called a progressive growing generative adversarial network (PGGAN) was proposed and combined with rotation and flipping methods. The method involves an incremental increase of the size of the model during the training to produce MR images of brain tumors and to help overcome the shortage of images for deep learning training.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While most data augmentation techniques aim to increase extraneous variance in the training set, deep learning can be used by itself, at least in theory, to increase meaningful variance. In a recent publication by Allah et al [ 44 ], a novel data augmentation method called a progressive growing generative adversarial network (PGGAN) was proposed and combined with rotation and flipping methods. The method involves an incremental increase of the size of the model during the training to produce MR images of brain tumors and to help overcome the shortage of images for deep learning training.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OLI-II vs. OLI-III DL-MajVot (AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, ResNet50) 5-fold CV SEN = 100%, SPE = 100%, AUC = 1 100 4. LGG vs. HGG DL-MajVot (AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, ResNet50) 5-fold CV SEN = 98.33%, SPE = 98.57%, AUC = 0.9845 98.43 Tandel et al [ 24 ] 2020 Normal vs. Tumorous Transfer learning with AlexNet Multiple CV (K2, K5, K10) RE = 100%, PRE = 100%, F1 score = 100% 100 Ayadi et al [ 98 ] 2021 Normal vs. Tumorous Custom CNN model 5-fold CV 100 Ye et al [ 126 ] 2022 Germinoma vs. Glioma Transfer learning with ResNet18 5-fold CV AUC = 0.88 81% 3 classes Allah et al [ 44 ] 2021 MEN vs. Glioma vs. PT PGGAN-augmentation VGG19 No info shared 98.54 Swati et al [ 50 ] 2019 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations