2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60816-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Colorectal Cancer Using Clustering and Feature Selection Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,23] Euclidean distance Internal Compute distances between the objects to quantify their degree of dissimilarity. [19,31,34,109] Inter-cluster distance Internal Quantify the degree of separation between individual clusters. [11] Manhattan distance Internal Correspond to the sum of lengths of the other two sides of a triangle.…”
Section: Measurements Categories Usage Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1,23] Euclidean distance Internal Compute distances between the objects to quantify their degree of dissimilarity. [19,31,34,109] Inter-cluster distance Internal Quantify the degree of separation between individual clusters. [11] Manhattan distance Internal Correspond to the sum of lengths of the other two sides of a triangle.…”
Section: Measurements Categories Usage Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measure the degree of confidence in a clustering assignment and lie in the interval [−1, +1], with well-clustered observations having values near +1 and near -1 for poorly clustered observations. [1,18,19,31,32,109] Square sum function of the error Internal Measure the quality of cluster either by compactness or homogeneity. [12,23,111] Entropy External Measure mutual information based on the probability distribution of random variables.…”
Section: Measurements Categories Usage Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further study will limit the subject age from new-born to 16 years old for male and new-born to 15 years old for female, for age estimation, according to the supported literatures and the findings. The future study will improve the results of the age estimation by studying other algorithms used by various other case studies available such as by Lenin, Reddy, and Kalavathi [46], Ismail et al [45], Ismail et al [46], Khaleel et al [47] and all other classification methods [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%