2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of electrohydrodynamic spraying modes of water in air at atmospheric pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As the applied electrical potential increased, the cone became thinner and sharper by the reinforced electrical force along the downward direction. As a result of the increase in the applied electrical potential from 9.5 to 11.5 kV, the average droplet sizes were gradually declined from 9.3 to 4.5 μm in diameter, which is in accordance with the previous report. , However, when the value of the applied electrical potential was over 12.5 kV, more than two Taylor cones (multijet mode) were formed by strong electrical force which can lead to jet instability. Therefore, the droplet size decreased from 3.1 μm in diameter at 12.5 kV to 2.3 μm in diameter at 13.5 kV. From these results, we have demonstrated that the droplet size could be controlled from 9.3 to 2.3 μm by adjusting the electrical potential.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…As the applied electrical potential increased, the cone became thinner and sharper by the reinforced electrical force along the downward direction. As a result of the increase in the applied electrical potential from 9.5 to 11.5 kV, the average droplet sizes were gradually declined from 9.3 to 4.5 μm in diameter, which is in accordance with the previous report. , However, when the value of the applied electrical potential was over 12.5 kV, more than two Taylor cones (multijet mode) were formed by strong electrical force which can lead to jet instability. Therefore, the droplet size decreased from 3.1 μm in diameter at 12.5 kV to 2.3 μm in diameter at 13.5 kV. From these results, we have demonstrated that the droplet size could be controlled from 9.3 to 2.3 μm by adjusting the electrical potential.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results we report here show how the pyrospraying is obtained by appropriate selection and control of solution, polymer properties, and EHD forces. This could be seen as an intrinsic limitation of our method, but we believe that this article could be a first insight into the novel p-Spray approach, furnishing some guidelines to experiment and comprehend it. Further studies on the modeling, simulation, and experimental works will be necessary in order to understand the process physics, predict the process outcome, and guide the process control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Usually, in classical spray for the functionalization of a line or also a small area, it must be used as a template intercepting the sprayed cloud so that after removing the template, we could have a negative stamp. Commonly various template/molding strategies are utilized to fabricate micro/nanopatterns in far-field condition, so that patterns are formed on the substrate after removing a special designed template, , which covers the target (Figure a). The setup is very similar to the one proposed for classical EHD spray, and the fabrication of the sprayed pattern is a direct result of the template adopted, so that additional time and template fabrication costs have to be added to the already expensive EHD apparatus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15,16 ] Moreover, a bending instability can also set in, or multiple jets can be issued from the same drop. [ 12–14,17–19 ]…”
Section: Fundamental Physics Of Electrosprayingmentioning
confidence: 99%