1996
DOI: 10.1002/met.5060030207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of ensemble forecasts by means of an artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also show that the similarity between an ensemble prediction and the climatology (the anomaly of the forecast), or between the predictions of different models, can be quantitatively measured using the relative entropy of the corresponding PDFs. Thus, this paper extends the work by Eckert et al (1996), who introduced the entropy for characterizing the dispersion, or spread, of the ensemble in a similar framework (medium‐range ensemble prediction systems).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also show that the similarity between an ensemble prediction and the climatology (the anomaly of the forecast), or between the predictions of different models, can be quantitatively measured using the relative entropy of the corresponding PDFs. Thus, this paper extends the work by Eckert et al (1996), who introduced the entropy for characterizing the dispersion, or spread, of the ensemble in a similar framework (medium‐range ensemble prediction systems).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…On the one hand, Cavazos (1999, 2000) applies SOMs from a climatic perspective to classify circulation fields and derive relationships with daily precipitation at local scale (the National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis is used in this case); however, no application to operative short‐range or ensemble forecast is performed. On the other hand, Eckert et al (1996) apply SOMs to characterize and group the ensemble members of a medium‐range ensemble forecast; however, in this case, no connection is made with local forecast (downscaling). The present paper shares a common methodology with the above described works, but applies it to a different framework, providing both operative local seasonal forecasts from a multi‐model ensemble (downscaling) and an estimation of the predictability of the resulting forecasts (ensemble analysis).…”
Section: Self‐organizing Maps For Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tennant and Hewitson (2002) use SOMs to explore the dynamic controls on intra-seasonal variability of precipitation. Meanwhile, Eckert et al (1996) used SOMs to classify members of ensemble forecasts. In this approach multiple forecasts are generated with a climate model, each with slightly different initialization conditions to allow one to explore the envelope of possible climate evolutions inherent in a chaotic system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used to improve temperature forecasts (e.g., Marzban 2003), thunderstorm forecasts (e.g., Manzato 2005), wind predictions (Kretzschmar et al 2004), quantitative precipitation forecasts (e.g., Kuligowski and Barros 1998;Hall et al 1999;Koizumi 1999), snowfall and snow density forecasts (Roebber et al 2003), rainfall-runoff processes (Hsu et al 1995), and quantitative precipitation estimation (Hsu et al 1997;Hsu et al 1999). However, applications of neural networks to classify (e.g., Eckert et al 1996;Scherrer et al 2004) ensemble members or calibrate (e.g., Mullen et al 1998;Mullen and Buizza 2004) ensemble forecasts appear relatively limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%