Abstract:In 1987 the UICC presented a proposal for TNM classification of brain tumors. This proposal is assessed in a retrospective study on 316 glioma and medulloblastoma patients treated in the Neurosurgical Clinic of the University Münster. It is evident that the T categories do not produce the correct sequence of prognostic differentiation required. The features of tumor spread used for classification are not of equal significance for the various types of tumors. In our opinion it is not possible to adequately desc… Show more
“…It is perhaps possible to modify and simplify further definitions of the T parameter. It is important to realize that the T parameter as defined in this study differs slightly from that of the UICC/AJC classification (16). The important deviation proposed (12) for staging…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, one important parameter proposed in the protocol was to col lect data prospectively on the T parameter of the TNM classification (6,12). In view of the virtual nonexistence of the métastasés (N or M) and the mandatory inclusion of only low-grade tumors, the T parameter was given im portance; it was defined as early as 1983 (Table 1) based on the personal experience (12) of the study chairman and inconclusive results of a study (16) based on the UICC classification (6).…”
Section: Workup Stratification and Randomizationmentioning
“…It is perhaps possible to modify and simplify further definitions of the T parameter. It is important to realize that the T parameter as defined in this study differs slightly from that of the UICC/AJC classification (16). The important deviation proposed (12) for staging…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, one important parameter proposed in the protocol was to col lect data prospectively on the T parameter of the TNM classification (6,12). In view of the virtual nonexistence of the métastasés (N or M) and the mandatory inclusion of only low-grade tumors, the T parameter was given im portance; it was defined as early as 1983 (Table 1) based on the personal experience (12) of the study chairman and inconclusive results of a study (16) based on the UICC classification (6).…”
Section: Workup Stratification and Randomizationmentioning
A 'TGS' classification for supratentorial brain glioma is proposed, based on three parameters: tumour extension (T), histopathological grade (G) and extent of surgical resection (S). Two groups of patients were analysed: the first (n = 137) had tumour submitted to stereotactic biopsy; the second (n = 60) had malignant glioma operated on by craniotomy and tumor resection. All three staging parameters significantly influenced survival. Histopathological grade was the most significant factor, and the only independent variable on multivariate analysis, followed by extent of tumour and then extent of surgical resection. The data support the applicability of the proposed parameters for a staging classification of hemispheric brain glioma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.