2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2019.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of locally strongly convex isotropic centroaffine hypersurfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1.3. Related to Theorem 1.1 we have established in [4] the classification of locally strongly convex isotropic centroaffine hypersurfaces. From the comparison of the main results in [1] and [4] one sees that the isotropic condition again have different implications in both equiaffine theory of hypersurfaces and centroaffine theory of hypersurfaces, just like Theorem 1.1 here and the Classification Theorem in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Remark 1.3. Related to Theorem 1.1 we have established in [4] the classification of locally strongly convex isotropic centroaffine hypersurfaces. From the comparison of the main results in [1] and [4] one sees that the isotropic condition again have different implications in both equiaffine theory of hypersurfaces and centroaffine theory of hypersurfaces, just like Theorem 1.1 here and the Classification Theorem in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Remark 1.3. Besides that as stated in [4], different characterizations on the typical examples of centroaffine hypersurfaces appearing in Theorem 1.1 were established in our recent articles, [2] and [3], from other aspects of differential geometric invariants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In affine differential geometry, hypersurfaces with isotropic difference tensor K have been studied in [2,4,14]. For centroaffine hypersurfaces, X. X. Cheng and Z. J. Hu classified locally strongly convex isotropic centroaffine hypersurfaces for all dimensions in [6]. Olivier Birembaux [1] studied lightlike isotropic but not pseudo-isotropic Lorentzian centroaffine surfaces M 2 in R 3 and classified all those surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%