DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87481-2_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Multi-labeled Data: A Generative Approach

Abstract: Multi-label classification assigns a data item to one or several classes. This problem of multiple labels arises in fields like acoustic and visual scene analysis, news reports and medical diagnosis. In a generative framework, data with multiple labels can be interpreted as additive mixtures of emissions of the individual sources. We propose a deconvolution approach to estimate the individual contributions of each source to a given data item. Similarly, the distributions of multi-label data are computed based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It captured the underlying structures via the latent random variables in a supervised manner. In Additive‐Generative Multi‐Label Model ( MAd Gen ), a deconvolution approach estimated the individual contribution of each label to a given data item and, in Ref , a set of three models based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) framework was presented.…”
Section: Mll Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It captured the underlying structures via the latent random variables in a supervised manner. In Additive‐Generative Multi‐Label Model ( MAd Gen ), a deconvolution approach estimated the individual contribution of each label to a given data item and, in Ref , a set of three models based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) framework was presented.…”
Section: Mll Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] For a single dataset, the CM has all the performance information available in detail. However, for ease of interpretation and comparing algorithms, the CM is summarized using several scalar performance metrics that are appropriate for detection and identification.…”
Section: Plume Identification Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers assume that all single labels are independent, and multi-labels are selected by selecting labels with high individual confidence values ( [26]). Other researchers utilize a mixture model to combine single label models ( [8], [10], [11], [17], [23], [25]). In [10], McCallum presented a Bayesianbased model for multi-label.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two typical transformation methods, Binary Relevance (BR) and Label Powerset (LP) ( [18], [20]). In BR, labels are assumed to be independent ( [7], [8], [10], [11], [17], [23]). Every label has its own single-label classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%