2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2243169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of remote sensed images using random forests and deep learning framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By this criterion, our classification results can be considered relevant and useful for practical applications, except for the 'car' class. As also reported by other related studies [14,17,67], compared to the other classes, the 'car' class is the most difficult category to classify, and its accuracy is usually around or even lower than 50% for most hand-crafted-features-based methods. After careful analysis, we think the following reasons may account for the low classification accuracies.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By this criterion, our classification results can be considered relevant and useful for practical applications, except for the 'car' class. As also reported by other related studies [14,17,67], compared to the other classes, the 'car' class is the most difficult category to classify, and its accuracy is usually around or even lower than 50% for most hand-crafted-features-based methods. After careful analysis, we think the following reasons may account for the low classification accuracies.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As far as the five specific classes are concerned, our method ranks first in the "imp surf" and "tree" classes; and second in the "building", "grass" and "car" classes. The strongest competitors are IVFL (86.5%, an object-based method) and RIT [67] (86.3%, a structured path-based method). Both methods classify the data using a random forest model.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tschannen et al [49] introduced a structured CNNs that employed Haar wavelet-based trees for identifying the semantic category of every pixel of remote sensing image. Piramanayagam et al [50] further exploited a multi-path CNNs that support both true ortho photo and digital surface model (DSM) for land cover classification. Marcu et al [51] presented a dual path, that is VGG-Net path and AlexNet path, to learn local and global representations of aerial images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our networks do not need these aides but achieve competitive scores compared with these approaches. For the fine-tuned networks from the pre-trained VGG-16 model (ONE [84], DLR [76], UOA [29], RIT [50]), their performances are not always steady compared to that of the proposed DMSMR approach. Our overall accuracy varies approximately 0.1% (see Ano (Ano is available at http://ftp.ipi.uni-hannover.de/ISPRS_WGIII_website/ISPRSIII_4_Test_results/2D_labeling_vaih/ 2D_labeling_Vaih_details_Ano/index.html) and Ano2 in the ISPRS leader board.…”
Section: Evaluation On Vaihingen Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation