2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of steel samples by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and random forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Classification is performed by computing a quadratic function of observed discrete spectral components.) This highly contrasts with sophisticated and complex classifiers previously attempted in the literature [7,[9][10][11]42].…”
Section: Applicability Of the Optimal Classifiermentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Classification is performed by computing a quadratic function of observed discrete spectral components.) This highly contrasts with sophisticated and complex classifiers previously attempted in the literature [7,[9][10][11]42].…”
Section: Applicability Of the Optimal Classifiermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Classification of LIBS data has been an active area of research. Automatic classification has been attempted on a variety of domains including mineralogy (classification of sedimentary ores [40], quartz samples [41], material science [42], botany [43], homeland security [44], and planetology [45]) The optimal classifier presented in the paper is relatively simple. (Classification is performed by computing a quadratic function of observed discrete spectral components.)…”
Section: Applicability Of the Optimal Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification, 98 especially supervised classification, identifies category membership assuming two or more classes, i.e., binary classification or multiclass classification. Many algorithms have been applied to the problem, e.g., linear discriminant analysis (LDA), 99,100 kernel approximation, 101 k-nearest neighbors, 102 naive Bayes, 103 support vector machine (SVM), [104][105][106][107] random forest (RF), 108,109 neural network (NN), [110][111][112][113] deep learning (DL), 12,114,115 etc. These algorithms are mainly enclosed in the scikit-learn.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheng et al used SVM and RF methods to discriminate and classify 10 types of iron ore samples; although both the SVM and RF models provided acceptably accurate predictions, RF provided better classification predictions. At the same time, Zhang et al proposed LIBS integrated with RF to identify and discriminate 9 steel grades, and its generation ability was evaluated by the out‐of‐bag estimation and 5‐fold CV. Compared with PLS‐DA and SVM, the RF model showed a better classification performance for steel samples.…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%