2007
DOI: 10.1505/ifor.9.2.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Turkish forests by altitudinal zones to improve silvicultural practice: a case-study of Turkish high mountain forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past centuries, Thracian forests have suffered heavy destruction, and 85% of old broadleaf forests had changed to coppice forests making it difficult to come across big old oak trees (Eraslan & Evcimen 1967). However, recent changes imposed by the Turkish Forestry Directorate favor the maintenance of a tall canopy composed of naturally regenerating trees (Colak & Rotterham 2007).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past centuries, Thracian forests have suffered heavy destruction, and 85% of old broadleaf forests had changed to coppice forests making it difficult to come across big old oak trees (Eraslan & Evcimen 1967). However, recent changes imposed by the Turkish Forestry Directorate favor the maintenance of a tall canopy composed of naturally regenerating trees (Colak & Rotterham 2007).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Turkish General Directorate of Forestry abandoned the practice in 2006, and a "close-to-nature" approach has been adopted where conversion to high forest originating from seed is promoted. This approach reflects a shift from a pure timber production objective to a more holistic objective that includes habitat conservation for wildlife (Colak & Rotterham 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. is one of the major species for afforestations as it is resistant to drought, frost damages and poor soils growing at the boundaries of steppe in the interior parts of the mountains in its distribution areas (Saatçioðlu 1969;Browicz 1982;Yücedað et al 2010;Douaihy et al 2011). In Turkey, it has a wide natural distribution in northern, western, central, and southern Anatolia, especially in the Taurus and Anti-Taurus Mountains (Yaltýrýk 1993) and grows between altitudes of 300 to 2300 m (Çolak and Rotherham 2007). This species, forming pure and mixed stands in Turkey (Avºar and Tonguç 2003), has economical functions due to the durability of its timber (Uçar and Balaban 2002), and organic and inorganic components in their cones (Baytop 1999).…”
Section: Vol 70 65-72mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diversity is also increased with regional differences since Turkey is located at the intersection of three phyto-geographical regions: Euro-Siberian, Mediterranean and Irano-Turanian (Çolak and Rotherham, 2007;Parolly, 2004). Therefore, Turkey has a rich flora in terms of total number of species (c. 12 000), and especially the number of endemics (more than 3 000) (Efe, 2010;Atalay and Efe 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turkey can be accepted as a mountainous country with an average altitude of 1132 m and most of the forests occur in the mountain zones (Atalay and Efe, 2015;Çolak and Rotherham, 2007). For this reason, mountains are very important for conservation of forests and biodiversity besides contributing to the local economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%