2020
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying Elite From Novice Athletes Using Simulated Wearable Sensor Data

Abstract: GR, RG, NT, and SF conceived the study and interpreted the results. GR and BD collected the data and performed the pre-processing of the data. GR implemented the OMAT, analyzed the results, and prepared the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another notable disadvantage that developers aim to mitigate is the issue of drifting, especially when placed near metal or magnetic fields due to the inner magnetometers. 16 , 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another notable disadvantage that developers aim to mitigate is the issue of drifting, especially when placed near metal or magnetic fields due to the inner magnetometers. 16 , 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of the previous works on gait analysis, ML models have been applied in ambulatory gait analysis and optical motion capture systems, whether in conjunction or as separate fields of studies. 16 , 17 Ambulatory gait analysis examines ‘normal walking bouts’ in healthy adults, such as running, walking. Regression models are generally preferred to evaluate gait parameters, such as walking speed, in ambulatory gait analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 88 publications, 29 applied a filter to their data (Table 8), with 16 in the healthcare domain, eight in the sports domain, and five in the wellness domain. The most common filter was the Butterworth filter, which was used in 18 publications (16 lowpass [29], [30], [32], [52], [54], [68], [69], [73], [76], [86], [105], [107], [108], [109], [112], [113], one high-pass [84], and one band-pass [50]), and then the moving average used in five publications [46], [92], [93], [94], [95]. Filters are most commonly applied to data captured from inertial sensors, with 14/39 publications that used inertial sensors applying them [29], [32], [50], [52], [68], [69], [73], [76], [102], [103], [109], [112], [113], [119].…”
Section: ) Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common filter was the Butterworth filter, which was used in 18 publications (16 lowpass [29], [30], [32], [52], [54], [68], [69], [73], [76], [86], [105], [107], [108], [109], [112], [113], one high-pass [84], and one band-pass [50]), and then the moving average used in five publications [46], [92], [93], [94], [95]. Filters are most commonly applied to data captured from inertial sensors, with 14/39 publications that used inertial sensors applying them [29], [32], [50], [52], [68], [69], [73], [76], [102], [103], [109], [112], [113], [119]. Among the publications that used optical cameras, 8/39 that used RGBD data applied filters [30], [46], [81], [86], [92], [93], [94], [95], and 5/9 of the ones that used high-end optical based s...…”
Section: ) Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%