2000
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/17/3/306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying geometries in general relativity: I. Standard forms for symmetric spinors

Abstract: This is the first in a series of papers concerning a project to set up a computer database of exact solutions in general relativity which can be accessed and updated by the user community. In this paper, we briefly discuss the Cartan-Karlhede invariant classification of geometries and the significance of the standard form of a spinor. We then present algorithms for putting the Weyl spinor, Ricci spinor and general spinors into standard form.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…it is also a canonical frame [17] for Petrov type D. We would like here to find that particular frame which converges to the Kinnersley frame when S → 1. We will dub this quasi-Kinnersley frame for a Petrov Type I space-time.…”
Section: E the Quasi-kinnersley Framementioning
confidence: 91%
“…it is also a canonical frame [17] for Petrov type D. We would like here to find that particular frame which converges to the Kinnersley frame when S → 1. We will dub this quasi-Kinnersley frame for a Petrov Type I space-time.…”
Section: E the Quasi-kinnersley Framementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Segre type [3] has one null eigenvector k a with eigenvalue α [34,35]. For Segre type [11,1] the eigenvectors forms a Lorentz frame…”
Section: Segre Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can quote an interesting work [6] where a detailed analysis has been made of the transformations leading to the standard canonical form of the Weyl tensor for the different Petrov-Bel types. In the mentioned study the authors present the transformations depending on the initial configuration of the Weyl components Ψ a , but "certain cases involving the solution of a quartic equation have not been specified" (see Table 2 in [6]). It is worth mentioning, for example, the case of type I spacetimes with non-vanishing initial transverse components.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal transverse bivector bases {W i , U i , V i } can be obtained as (11) where {W i } is given in theorem 2. Once the transverse bivector bases {W T , U T , V T } are known, we can look for the transverse frames {l T , n T , m T ,m T } associated with them by (6). To obtain them, we could apply to the bivectors {W T , U T , V T } the covariant method to determine the principal directions of a 2-form [14] (see also [10] [11]), but here we opt by an alternative procedure based on proposition 2: starting from an arbitrary null tetrad {l, k, m,m} we will obtain the Weyl orthonormal frame {e α } and, from it, we derive the null transverse frames {l T , k T , m T ,m T }.…”
Section: Obtaining Transverse Frames From An Ar-bitrary Framementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation