2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classifying the posture and activity of ewes and lambs using accelerometers and machine learning on a commercial flock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, on-animal sensor technologies are predominantly used in the dairy sector, where the cost–benefit of their use is widely accepted to be positive, especially for enhancing reproductive performance [ 45 ]. PLF technology has potential benefits in the sheep industry, with recent research demonstrating that collar-attached accelerometers can be a practical and feasible method of monitoring commercial flock behaviour [ 46 ]. Currently, measures implemented for TST of sheep, such as BCS in ewes and growth rates in lambs, can be recorded cheaply, and any future PLF technology would need to outperform these methods to be a viable option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, on-animal sensor technologies are predominantly used in the dairy sector, where the cost–benefit of their use is widely accepted to be positive, especially for enhancing reproductive performance [ 45 ]. PLF technology has potential benefits in the sheep industry, with recent research demonstrating that collar-attached accelerometers can be a practical and feasible method of monitoring commercial flock behaviour [ 46 ]. Currently, measures implemented for TST of sheep, such as BCS in ewes and growth rates in lambs, can be recorded cheaply, and any future PLF technology would need to outperform these methods to be a viable option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is now considerable use of machine learning to classify postures and other behaviours, particularly among farm animals (e.g. Hansen et al ., 2018; Neethirajan, 2020; Balasso et al ., 2021; Price et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Measuring Positive Affect In Non‐human Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors of Actiwatch Mini ® activity monitor attached to the necks of the ewes when used in combination with the activity scores to record behaviors with an overall accuracy of 79.98% and 74.56% for active and inactive, respectively [92]. The accelerometer GENEActiv has a 83.7% average accuracy of standing and lying and a 80.8% average accuracy of grazing, rumination, inactive and walking in ewes, a 85.9% average accuracy of standing and lying and a 85.9% average accuracy of inactive, suckling, walking in lambs by random forest decision tree [102], while the accelerometer ActiGraph can detect the grazing, walking and resting behaviors of lambs on pasture with a classification accuracy of 89.6% [103]. The neck-mounted devices of AXY-3 accelerometer were used along with fractal methods to record temporal sequences of behavioral activity patterns of parasitized sheep which spent 66.03% ± 24.49% of the day and 18.30% ± 8.58% of the night active during the experimental periods, indicating an accurate description of the activity/inactivity patterns of sheep although the activity/inactivity patterns of parasitized sheep rely on long-term activity events and gastrointestinal parasite infection [115].…”
Section: Collar-mounted Accelerometersmentioning
confidence: 99%