The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics 2015
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139764377.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classroom applicationsof corpus analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students have to do with a "massive but controlled exposure to authentic input, " so fundamental for language learning (Cobb and Boulton, 2015) and such controlled and contextualized contact fosters more language awareness, noticing and autonomy. Corpora do not only contain the answer to many possible questions: the investigation itself leads to better metalinguistic competencies.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students have to do with a "massive but controlled exposure to authentic input, " so fundamental for language learning (Cobb and Boulton, 2015) and such controlled and contextualized contact fosters more language awareness, noticing and autonomy. Corpora do not only contain the answer to many possible questions: the investigation itself leads to better metalinguistic competencies.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 In terms of research as a whole, Boulton (2012a) reviewed twenty studies that attempt empirical evaluation of some aspect of corpus use in ESP, finding that learners even with relatively limited levels of proficiency and linguistic sophistication can appreciate them and derive benefit from them in a variety of conditions -on paper or hands-on, as a learning aid or reference tool, etc. In a meta-analysis of 21 DDL studies (not just ESP), Cobb and Boulton (2015) found a mean gain (pre/post-test) of d=1.68, and a mean difference (control/experimental group) of d=1.04; these figures represent large effect sizes according to Plonsky and Oswald's (2014) meticulous survey of previous metaanalyses in language teaching and learning as a whole. A more rigorous and inclusive meta-analysis by the same authors (Boulton & Cobb in preparation) identified over 200 empirical studies of DDL, the majority of which involved learners majoring in nonlinguistic subjects and/or needing English for specific purposes, with only slightly lower effect sizes.…”
Section: Integrating Corpus Tools and Techniques In Esp Coursesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Teachers and students have been using concordances or alike to obtain, organize, and study real language data derived from corpora. This approach is called data-driven learning (Johns, 1991), and is advocated by many researchers (for instance, Boulton & Thomas, 2012;Boulton & Pérez-Paredes, 2014;Chang, 2014;Cobb & Boulton, 2015;Vyatkina, 2016;Boulton & Cobb, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%