2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40299-019-00492-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classroom Interactions in the Target Language: Learners’ Perceptions, Willingness to Communicate, and Communication Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skillful use of synchronous communication, both in video format and in chat format, can quickly improve students' and teachers' communication skills. The primary motivation is often the possibility of communication on topics of interest in the target language [43,44]. Internet networks provide students with a massive number of sites, videoconferences, chats on entirely different topics.…”
Section: Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Communication Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skillful use of synchronous communication, both in video format and in chat format, can quickly improve students' and teachers' communication skills. The primary motivation is often the possibility of communication on topics of interest in the target language [43,44]. Internet networks provide students with a massive number of sites, videoconferences, chats on entirely different topics.…”
Section: Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Communication Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, teacher and student interaction are significant because they are a way to assess students' material comprehension [52]. Furthermore, students feel that in-class interaction motivates them to communicate [53], [54], which allows them to experiment with the language. In an online class, internet connection makes interaction possible through video conference applications such as Zoom and Google Meet or chatting services through Learning Management System such as Moodle, Edmodo, and Google Classroom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that a principal motivation for learning an L2 is to use it for communicative purposes with people from a different speech community (MacIntyre, 2007), L2 WTC-which according to research has a causal association with L2 use (Hashimoto, 2002)-is considered an important individual difference factor in L2 acquisition (MacIntyre, 2007;Matsuoka & Evans, 2005). In light of the salience of learners' L2 WTC, research has shown that it can be directly and indirectly explained by learners' individual differences with respect to antecedents such as communicative anxiety (MacIntyre et al, 2003), personality (MacIntyre et al, 1999), attitudes and motivation (Wang et al, 2019;Yashima, 2002;Yashima et al, 2004), self-perceived communicative competence and self-confidence (Cao & Philp, 2006;Hashimoto, 2002;MacIntyre & Charos, 1996;Yu, 2009), and learning belief (Fushino, 2010;Peng, 2014). Similarly, many contextual antecedents have also been found to be predictive of learners' L2 WTC, such as classroom environment (Peng & Woodrow, 2010), group size (Cao & Philp, 2006;Zarrinabadi et al, 2014), cultural background (Cao & Philp, 2006), and teacher-related factors (Kang, 2005;Mystkowska-Wiertelak, 2016;Tavakoli & Zarrinabadi, 2018;Wen & Clément, 2003;Zarrinabadi, 2014;Zarrinabadi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Wtc In L2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a pioneering study on verifying a causal SEM model, Wang et al (2019) found that learners' attitudes toward teacher-learner interaction and learner-learner interaction had differential effects on the learners' L2 WTC and learning behaviors. Hence, presumably and logically, teachers' attitudes toward teacher-learner interaction and learner-learner interaction may likewise exert varying degrees of explanatory power over both the teachers' L2 WTC and their TB.…”
Section: Teachers' Wtc In Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation