2016
DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2016.0410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classroom vs. E-Learning: A Case Study on the Performance of Students in Different Learning Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lecture room is a conducive environment for learning because once a student is in class, he/she forgets about all the troubles at home; hence the research shows that classroom learning was significantly preferred than E-learning. The study carried out by Dondorf et al (2016) aligns with this current one, for it equally confirms that classroom learners performed significantly better than the students using the e-learning platform. Although this is contrary to the findings of Lim, Kim, Chen, and Ryder (2008), who discovered that students using the online learning platform achieved better results compared to the traditional mode of face-to-face teaching.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lecture room is a conducive environment for learning because once a student is in class, he/she forgets about all the troubles at home; hence the research shows that classroom learning was significantly preferred than E-learning. The study carried out by Dondorf et al (2016) aligns with this current one, for it equally confirms that classroom learners performed significantly better than the students using the e-learning platform. Although this is contrary to the findings of Lim, Kim, Chen, and Ryder (2008), who discovered that students using the online learning platform achieved better results compared to the traditional mode of face-to-face teaching.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Equally, this study finds that students owning smartphones are negatively significant to the study because it causes distraction (Dondorf, Breuer, & Nacken, 2016). Students have a strong liking for social life, and they prefer using their data on social media rather than engaging themselves in online learning.…”
Section: Students' Willingness To Adopt E-learningmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Similar findings were shown by Dondorf T et al, & Abbasi S et.al., who observed that the traditional classroom teaching was more successful than the Online classes in their study. 11,12 In contrast, Lall S & Singh N with Hannay M & Newvine T observed in their study that students prefer Online classes more than traditional classroom teaching. 13,14 Many participants have reported limited access to a stable internet, distractions at home environment & lack of personal interaction as the limitations to Online learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Many researchers have performed several studies regarding students' performance in the two different learning modes. For example, Dondorf et al (2016) compared the face-to-face classroom learning setting with an online learning setting in a mathematics course in an undergraduate programme and found that the students in the classroom performed much better than the students in the online learning setting. The result could relate to reduced student motivation in online learning.…”
Section: Previous Studies On Comparison Of Face-to-face and Online Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire for students included demographic items, questions to assess students' attitude towards face-to-face Quran class versus Quran online learning, learning experience, learning comfort, motivation to participate in the class, cognitive engagement, and class interaction. The questionnaire was adopted from the work by Ni (2013), (Dondorf et al, 2016) and (Luaran et al, 2014) about the issues related to students during online education. The questions are presented later in Figure 2 and Figure 3 in results and discussions section.…”
Section: Research Site Participant and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%