2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clay minerals on Mars: An up-to-date review with future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 300 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimental and field studies have demonstrated that Fe/Mg clays and zeolites can also form by direct precipitation or transformation of precursor minerals in near‐neutral to alkaline waters at ambient temperature (Bristow & Milliken, 2011; English, 2001; Pedro et al., 1978; Tosca et al., 2011). Talc‐like clays (talc, kerolite) can form at 25°C by direct precipitation from Mg‐rich alkaline brines with a pH >8.5 (Bristow & Milliken, 2011; Tosca et al., 2011; Tutolo & Tosca, 2018); nontronite can form from a ferrihydrite precursor or as secondary product of the reaction of silica with Fe‐oxides (Pedro et al., 1978), which are common and widespread on Mars (Du et al., 2023; Hazen et al., 2023; Rampe, Blake, et al., 2020); zeolites can crystallize from an authigenic amorphous aluminous smectite in saline Na‐rich brines (English, 2001; Hay & Sheppard, 2001; Langella et al., 2001; Remy & Ferrell, 1989), a scenario that is in agreement with model results in this study that predicted zeolites forming after smectites during evaporation of abiotically evolved fluids (Figure 4). Following these arguments, we suggest that water–basalt interaction may not be the only pathway that led to Fe/Mg clays and zeolites formation in Martian basins and neo‐formation of these minerals following evaporation of alkaline brines should not be entirely ruled out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experimental and field studies have demonstrated that Fe/Mg clays and zeolites can also form by direct precipitation or transformation of precursor minerals in near‐neutral to alkaline waters at ambient temperature (Bristow & Milliken, 2011; English, 2001; Pedro et al., 1978; Tosca et al., 2011). Talc‐like clays (talc, kerolite) can form at 25°C by direct precipitation from Mg‐rich alkaline brines with a pH >8.5 (Bristow & Milliken, 2011; Tosca et al., 2011; Tutolo & Tosca, 2018); nontronite can form from a ferrihydrite precursor or as secondary product of the reaction of silica with Fe‐oxides (Pedro et al., 1978), which are common and widespread on Mars (Du et al., 2023; Hazen et al., 2023; Rampe, Blake, et al., 2020); zeolites can crystallize from an authigenic amorphous aluminous smectite in saline Na‐rich brines (English, 2001; Hay & Sheppard, 2001; Langella et al., 2001; Remy & Ferrell, 1989), a scenario that is in agreement with model results in this study that predicted zeolites forming after smectites during evaporation of abiotically evolved fluids (Figure 4). Following these arguments, we suggest that water–basalt interaction may not be the only pathway that led to Fe/Mg clays and zeolites formation in Martian basins and neo‐formation of these minerals following evaporation of alkaline brines should not be entirely ruled out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various cationic clay minerals such as goethite, hematite, gibbsite, kaolinite, illite, vermiculite, montmorillonite, saponite, nontronite, or even Martian minerals and their anionic counterparts such as LDH and hydrotalcites were already found to exhibit affinity towards CO 2 [167][168][169]. In hydrotalcite-based sorbents, changes in the charge-compensating anion and/or incorporation of other metals than Mg and Al were found to play key roles in the CO 2 retention capacity (CRC) [170,171].…”
Section: Potential Co 2 Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrous minerals on the surface of Mars and their spatial and temporal distributions can be used to deduce the formation and evolution history of martian sediments, which is indicative of the environmental changes on Mars (Bishop & Rampe, 2016;Fraeman et al, 2013). Based on the visible and near-infrared spectroscopy (VNIR) data collected by the Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l'Eau, les Glaces et l'Activité (OMEGA) onboard the European Space Agency's Mars Express mission and the Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars (CRISM) onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), NASA, the mineralogy of martian sediments at the global scale, including mainly the distribution of hydrous minerals such as clay minerals (Du et al, 2023;Poulet et al, 2005) and sulfates (Gendrin et al, 2005), have been documented, which indicates the presence of different aqueous geochemical environments such as surface runoff and subsurface hydrothermal systems (Ehlmann et al, 2011). In addition to these well-crystallized minerals, Mars orbital and in situ data show that poorly ordered (and even nearly amorphous) minerals are widely distributed on the martian surface, mainly including aluminosilicate nanominerals (e.g., allophane), amorphous silica (e.g., opal-A), and nanophase iron minerals (including all poorly ordered materials containing octahedral Fe 3+ , which can be any combination of superparamagnetic hematite, goethite, ferrihydrite, lepidocrocite, schwertmannite, akaganeite, and other Fe 3+ -rich phases) (Bish et al, 2013;Blake et al, 2013;Morris et al, 1989Morris et al, , 2004Smith et al, 2021;Vaniman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%