2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleaning verification assays for highly potent compounds by high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry: Strategy, validation, and long-term performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, sample collection and analysis are time-consuming. For example, swabbing and a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, which is most commonly used for detection in cleaning studies [7], can take several hours. Hence, the verification of the cleaning procedure following each cleaning step is cumbersome, while the FDA requires continued process verification [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, sample collection and analysis are time-consuming. For example, swabbing and a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, which is most commonly used for detection in cleaning studies [7], can take several hours. Hence, the verification of the cleaning procedure following each cleaning step is cumbersome, while the FDA requires continued process verification [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of cleaning verification is typically conducted by swabbing the spoiled manufacturing equipment, extracting residue from the swab and then subjecting the extract to analysis. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is typically used for analysis of residues [1–3] . The principal disadvantage associated with HPLC analysis is the length of time involved in running the necessary samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is typically used for analysis of residues. [1][2][3] The principal disadvantage associated with HPLC analysis is the length of time involved in running the necessary samples. Adequately representing the cleanliness of the equipment train can result in the analysis of 70-80 swabs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional analytical method employed by the pharmaceutical industry for cleaning validation involves sampling of the manufacturing equipment followed by highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC). 1,[4][5][6][7][8][9] Product Introduction L. Alvarez-Jubete et al, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21, 173-182 (2013) Received: 8 January 2013 n Revised: 21 June 2013 n Accepted: 24 June 2013 n Publication: 9 July 2013 contact surfaces on the manufacturing equipment are typically sampled for residual mass quantitation by swab or rinse sampling. 1,[4][5][6][7][8][9] An important disadvantage of the use of HPLC analysis for cleaning validation is the length of time required for the analysis. 1,[10][11][12][13] Presently, cleaning validation of manufacturing equipment involving collection and preparation of samples for HPLC analysis, data acquisition and processing results in a time requirement of up to two days with associated loss of production time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%