2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jher.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clear-water scour depth below underwater pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result, namely the decrease in scour depth due to US, is in agreement with the results of Sarkar and Dey (2007) and Dey and Singh (2007). However, this result is in disagreement with the results of the studies of Cheng and Chiew (1998a, b;1999), Yang (2013), and Dey and Sarkar (2007), who stated that the US can increase the scour depth.…”
Section: Applying Upward Seepagesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our result, namely the decrease in scour depth due to US, is in agreement with the results of Sarkar and Dey (2007) and Dey and Singh (2007). However, this result is in disagreement with the results of the studies of Cheng and Chiew (1998a, b;1999), Yang (2013), and Dey and Sarkar (2007), who stated that the US can increase the scour depth.…”
Section: Applying Upward Seepagesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Here, a brief review of the former is given. Dey and Singh (2007) studied the scour depth downstream of an underwater pipeline and showed a graphical relationship between the non-dimensional scour depth and dimensionless seepage velocity. Their results revealed that the scour depth is smaller in the presence of US, with a maximum reduction of about 34% when the dimensionless velocity was equal to 0.0015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the friction coefficient, which can be obtained using the Colebrook-White equation ( Dey and Singh, 2007):…”
Section: Prediction Of Scour Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…include: mean flow velocity of the approach flow , V (on the assumption of a fully developed boundary layer); undisturbed approach flow depth, y,,; density of water, p; density of the sediment, ps; viscosity of water, j1; channel width, B; median grain size of bed material, d 50 ; diameter of the pipeline, D ; pipeline embedment, e, where e = vertical distance between the bottom of the pipeline to the undisturbed sediment bed level (In this study, a positive value of e means that the pipeline is buried in the sediment bed); and acceleration due to gravity g (Moncada-M and Aguirre-Pe, 1999). Dey and Singh (2008) have reported other variables, which also could influence the pipeline scouring such as geometric standard deviation of the bed sediment, CT g and shape of the pipeline cross section. In this study, CT g , however, is a dimensionless constant and the shape of all pipeline models tested is circular.…”
Section: Figure 1 Top View Of a Scour Hole Dimensional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%