2009
DOI: 10.1080/13682820802196815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech (CAPS‐A): a comprehensive training package for speech analysis

Abstract: Speech and language therapists benefited from training on the CAPS-A, focusing on specific aspects of speech using definitions of parameters and scalar points, in order to apply the tool systematically and reliably. Ratings are enhanced by ensuring a high degree of attention to the nature of the data, standardizing the speech sample, data acquisition, the listening process together with the use of high-quality recording and playback equipment. In addition, a method is proposed for maintaining listening skills … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
185
2
27

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
185
2
27
Order By: Relevance
“…International studies regarding perceptual-auditory analysis have been warning that rater experience is an important factor, and that was enough, to a certain extent, for agreement coefficients to be high. However, presently, only using the criterion regarding the length of experience of an examiner does not seem to be sufficient anymore, training being a requirement (29) . In this study, no training was provided, neither reference samples were used, as the aim in the raters' assessments was to identify nasality in the subjects producing the two mentioned samples, which, theoretically, would use the same internal patterns of examiners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International studies regarding perceptual-auditory analysis have been warning that rater experience is an important factor, and that was enough, to a certain extent, for agreement coefficients to be high. However, presently, only using the criterion regarding the length of experience of an examiner does not seem to be sufficient anymore, training being a requirement (29) . In this study, no training was provided, neither reference samples were used, as the aim in the raters' assessments was to identify nasality in the subjects producing the two mentioned samples, which, theoretically, would use the same internal patterns of examiners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some aspects concerning the general orofacial myofunctional assessment, such as mobility, muscular tonus, chewing and swallowing, were not anticipated, as it is believed that such assessments do not differ from those applied in other cases and thus other available assessment tools (5,6) can be used. The elaboration of the items contemplated in the proposal was based on professional experience and in the literature on the field of orofacial motricity and related to cleft lip and palate (4,5,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) . In the first version proposed, the examiners who analyzed it suggested some adjustments related to possible answers, which helped clarify the proposal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing the various aspects presented in the literature that may influence the perceptual speech analysis, a study of literature review has brought questions about the extent to which the experience of the judge, when considered as a single factor, ensures satisfactory degree of agreement between judges 7 . Another study 16 , when using a procedure specifically designed for training the speech assessment of CLP population, obtained good agreement between judges in the identification order to identify these productions and also establish appropriate therapeutic planning 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%