2019
DOI: 10.1177/0885412219842520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clientelism and Planning in the Informal Settlements of Developing Democracies

Abstract: The informal provision of benefits to the poor in exchange for political support, known as clientelism, often provides access to land and services for the urban poor in informal settlements in developing democracies. This review of multidisciplinary literature finds that while clientelism provides the urban poor with some access to the state, its benefits are often inadequate and inequitable. This kind of informal provision also disincentivizes or interferes with the implementation of formal plans. The literat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, political clientelism is what guarantees their access to the state, basic services and public goods. Deuskar (2019) demonstrates that while clientelism provides the poor with some access to the state, it also prevents them from participating fully in democracy and hinders the long-term provision of public goods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, political clientelism is what guarantees their access to the state, basic services and public goods. Deuskar (2019) demonstrates that while clientelism provides the poor with some access to the state, it also prevents them from participating fully in democracy and hinders the long-term provision of public goods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noticed by researchers in other countries (for India see Auerbach and Thachil, 2018;Deuskar, 2019), political parties in Nepal have made land distribution a tool to expand their clientele and boost their votes (Ninglekhu, 2016). Informal settlers are also using their political connections to expand their settlements, increase their access to public services and legitimise those services (ibid; Shrestha et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion: Towards Socially Just Transitions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long histories of struggle and failed interventions in informal settlements frequently lead to skepticism of ready-made solutions that seem "too good," especially if presented by people "from outside." Clientelist practices and forgotten campaign promises by politicians reinforce informal settlement residents' skepticism of quick fixes and readymade solutions (Deuskar, 2019). Such histories and realities demonstrate the importance of mobilizing residents to develop agency and ownership over the project and process.…”
Section: Mobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%